Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 22;56(3):e01785-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01785-17

TABLE 5.

Evaluation of real-time RT-PCR methodsa

Patient population RT-PCR
ZCD
Trioplex
Sens (95% CI) Spec (95% CI) Sens (95% CI) Spec (95% CI)
Overall 96.1 (91.1–98.7) 100 (97.9–100) 96.1 (91.1–98.7) 100 (97.9–100)
Zika virus positive 96.1 (91.1–98.7) NA 96.1 (91.1–98.7) NA
    DENV naïve 93.5 (84.3–98.2) NA 95.2 (86.5–99) NA
    DENV immune 98.5 (91.7–100) NA 96.9 (89.3–99.6) NA
Dengue virus positive NA 100 (96.3–100) NA 100 (96.3–100)
    DENV1 NA 100 (85.8–100) NA 100 (85.8–100)
    DENV2 NA 100 (89.7–100) NA 100 (89.7–100)
    DENV3 NA 100 (91–100) NA 100 (91–100)
Negative NA 100 (95.3–100) NA 100 (95.3–100)
a

Sens, sensitivity. Sensitivity values were calculated for each assay based on ZIKV-positive samples, stratified by those who had been previously infected with DENV (DENV immune) and those who were DENV naïve. Spec, specificity. Specificity values were calculated for each assay based on two groups of ZIKV-negative samples: (i) ZIKV-negative DENV-positive samples, stratified by DENV subtype (DENV1 to DENV3) and primary and secondary infection, and (ii) ZIKV-negative DENV-negative controls. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. NA, not applicable: data from ZIKV-positive cases served only for determination of sensitivity and were not used for the specificity calculation. Similarly, data from ZIKV-negative cases served only for determination of specificity and were not used for the sensitivity calculation.