Table 4. Comparison of mean inferior quadrant RNFL thickness between EM, LM, MM and HM groups.
| Refractive error groups | Adjusted mean (95%CI) | 1Adjusted mean difference (95%CI) | aP |
| EM/LM | 130.73 (127.77, 133.70)/126.45 (123.15, 129.75) | 4.28 (-1.12, 9.69) | 0.217 |
| EM/MM | 130.73 (127.77, 133.70)/123.83 (119.16, 128.50) | 6.90 (-1.01, 14.82) | 0.127 |
| EM/HM | 130.73 (127.77, 133.70)/116.42 (108.13, 124.71) | 14.31 (1.65, 26.97) | 0.017 |
| LM/MM | 126.45 (123.15, 129.75)/123.83 (119.16, 128.50) | 2.62 (-4.70, 9.94) | 1.000 |
| LM/HM | 126.45 (123.15, 129.75)/116.42 (108.13, 124.71) | 10.03 (-1.76, 21.82) | 0.148 |
| MM/HM | 123.83 (119.16, 128.50)/116.42 (108.13, 124.71) | 7.41 (-3.22, 18.04) | 0.392 |
EM: Emmetropia; LM: Low myopia; MM: Moderate myopia; HM: High myopia; CI: Confidence interval. 1ANCOVA was applied, with post-hoc Bonferroni correction; aP<0.05 is statistically significant.