Skip to main content
. 2017 May 18;3(9):1281–1283. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1062

Table. Effectiveness of Telephone and SMS Reminders on Rate of FIT Pickup and Return.

Intervention Type No. FIT Pickup Rate P Value FIT Return Rate P Value
% ADa AOR (95% CI) % ADa AOR (95% CI)
Usual care as reference
Usual care 207 62.3 1 [Reference] 69.1 1 [Reference]
SMS group 209 78.5 16.2 2.35 (1.50-3.70) <.001 82.8 13.7 2.39 (1.47-3.88) <.001
Telephone group 205 89.8 27.5 6.14 (3.54-10.64) <.001 91.2 22.1 5.23 (2.92-9.37) <.001
SMS group as reference
SMS group 209 78.5 1 [Reference] 82.8 1 [Reference]
Telephone group 205 89.8 11.3 2.39 (1.36-4.20) .002 91.2 8.4 2.16 (1.18-3.95) .01

Abbreviations: AD, absolute difference; AOR, adjusted odds ratios; CRC, colorectal cancer; FIT, fecal immunochemical test; SMS, short message service.

a

Absolute difference in proportions when compared with the reference group; adjusted odds ratios, covariates included age, sex, comorbidities, use of medications, educational level, monthly household income, job status, marital status, smoking, alcohol intake, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), waist circumference, family history of CRC in a first-degree relative.