Table II.

Location of Intervention by Type of Structural Interventions in HIV Prevention (k = 213)

	Type of Structural Intervention
Continent/Region	PP	MM	PS	CB	CM	SDH	A	TOTALa
Americas	38 (37%)	22 (21%)	28 (27%)	23 (22%)	6 (6%)	5 (5%)	72 (69%)	104 (49%)
United States	32	18	22	21	4	3	56	84
Latin America & Caribbean	3	2	3	1	2	2	9	13
Canada	3	2	3	1	0	0	7	7
Africab	12 (23%)	16 (31%)	17 (33%)	18 (35%)	4 (8%)	8 (15%)	30(58%)	52(24%)
East Africa	4	5	7	8	1	1	12	20
Southern Africa	4	3	6	6	2	6	10	17
Central Africa	4	4	3	3	1	0	6	9
West Africa	0	4	1	1	0	1	2	6
Asiab	8 (22%)	16 (44%)	7 (19%)	7 (19%)	10 (28%)	3 (8%)	24 (67%)	36 (17%)
Southeast Asia	6	8	2	2	4	0	10	15
East Asia	2	4	2	3	1	1	7	11
South Asia	0	4	3	2	5	2	7	10
Europec	10 (56%)	6 (33%)	5 (28%)	3 (17%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	12 (67%)	18 (8%)
Australia	0 (0%)	2 (67%)	1 (33%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (33%)	3 (1%)

A: Access; CB: Capacity Building; CM: Community Mobilization; MM: Mass Media; PP: Policy/Procedure; PS: Physical structure; SDH: Social Determinants of Health

^aPercentages in far right column indicatethe proportion of 213 studies from each continent / region; all other percentages represent the proportion of interventions within each continent or region that include each structural type

^b5 multi-regional studies are included in the region with the most countries represented, e.g., a study in 4 countries in Southern Africa and 1 country in East Africa is included in the row for Southern Africa; if thelargest number of countries is a tie then the study is included with the country that has the largest population, e.g., a study in Zambia and Rwanda is included in the row for Central Africa

^cIncludes Western and Eastern Europe