Table 6.
R2-a | R2-b | R2-c | R2-d | R2-e | R2-f | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1-a | 0.00 ± 0.51 | 1.25 ± 0.35a | −1.41 ± 0.28 | −6.65 ± 0.38 | −3.99 ± 0.20 | 0.65 ± 0.25 |
R1-b | 0.68 ± 0.37a | 1.70 ± 0.28 | −0.07 ± 0.22 | −6.07 ± ∞c | −3.22 ± 0.33 | 1.39 ± 0.22 |
R1-c | −1.26 ± 0.29 | 0.56 ± 0.33 | −2.14 ± 0.23b | −8.20 ± 0.31 | −4.94 ± 0.22 | −0.30 ± 0.19 |
R1-d | −4.49 ± ∞c | −6.11 ± 0.24 | −7.72 ± 0.63 | −15.94 ± 0.22 | −12.30 ± 0.25 | −8.28 ± 0.29 |
R1-e | −2.58 ± ∞c | −2.09 ± 0.55 | −4.73 ± 0.38 | −11.39 ± 0.40 | −8.04 ± 0.37 | −3.98 ± 0.22 |
R1-f | 1.57 ± ∞c | 1.88 ± 1.24 | 0.09 ± ∞c | −8.93 ± 0.54 | −5.13 ± 0.61 | 0.40 ± 0.37 |
The difference between symmetric derivatives, ΔGxy→yx, should be zero. ΔGsolvation(ab → ba) = (0.68 ± 0.37) − (1.25 ± 0.35) = −0.57 ± 0.51. Excluding da, ea, fa, and fc, the root mean square difference between symmetric derivatives is 0.71 and the root mean square precision is 0.65.
The ΔGsolvation (aa → cc) value −2.14 ± 0.56 is consistent with the two substituent value of −1.99 ± 0.05 from Table 5, which was not the case with hard-core interactions.
No estimate of precision could be obtained from bootstrap analysis for molecules that were not visited in all production simulations. These molecules are denoted with ±∞. The free energy estimates for these molecules are still within 0.04 to 2.16 kcal/mol of their symmetric derivatives.