Table 2.

Positive comments and areas for improvement from the thematic analysis

Positive comments	Areas for improvement
These podcasts are the best thing ever. It makes the learning of the indicative presentations so much easier and interactive. A brilliant idea.	The voice was clear but could do with a little more enthusiasm to improve engagement.
Very good use of flow starting with anatomy and epidemiology before moving onto the specific aims of the podcasts with good resources at the end.	The presenter spoke very clearly, but more variation in his tone would have made the podcast easier to listen to – a personal touch every now and again throughout the podcast would have helped maintain the viewers’ attention.
Very clear and good pace of the video. I have always struggled to find a way to learn about diabetes. I think this video is the best way to learn about it that I’ve come across when you don’t have the time to spend hours on it.	I think that the video could have been split into two videos, for example one on acute renal failure and another on chronic renal failure.
Full disease framework employed, brief and concise for all the discussed areas.	Hemodialysis should again be a separate video – the viewer is never going to retain any of the information because it is so overwhelming.
Good level of detail within the podcast and liked the layout of the session, going through causes, investigations and management was really useful for clinical practice.	Should be accompanied by a video/pictures to show the examination being done and/or the abnormalities being talked about.
Good diagram of the visual pathway and good use of colors to explain lesions.	Use of a clinical scenario that remained consistent throughout the video to demonstrate some of the symptoms, tests to be done etc.