Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 20;6(2):2325967118755330. doi: 10.1177/2325967118755330

TABLE 1.

Measurements of Angular Deformitya

Age, y Mechanical Lateral Distal Femoral Angle, deg Medial Proximal Tibial Angle, deg Mechanical Axis Deviation, mm
Patient Sex Chronological Bone Surgical Nonsurgical Surgical Nonsurgical Surgical Nonsurgical
1 M 9.7 85 86 86 86 0 –1
2b M 10.3 12.0 86 87 87 89 2 2
3 M 11.1 88 90 90 87 1 –1
4 M 12.0 12.5 86 88 89 87 1 –1
5 F 12.2 13.5 83 85 88 86 1 1
6 M 12.3 12.5 85 87 87 88 0 1
7 M 12.3 88 87 87 89 1 0
8 F 12.3 12.0 85 85 80 83 –1 –1
9 M 12.4 13.0 81 86 87 84 2 –1
10 M 12.8 12.5 83 84 88 88 1 2
11 M 13.1 14.0 85 87 90 85 1 –2
12 M 13.2 15.0 88 87 89 89 0 1
13 M 13.3 14.0 86 86 82 84 –2 –1
14 M 13.5 13.0 93 92 94 92 2 4
15 M 13.5 14.0 85 86 84 85 –1 –1
16 F 13.7 15.0 88 87 88 88 0 0
17 F 14.1 85 86 83 83 –1 –1
18c M 14.4 14.0 86 83 88 86 10 10
19 M 14.4 15.0 84 86 79 80 –2 –3
20 M 14.6 12.5 83 83 87 84 2 0
21d F 14.7 87 87 89 94 1 2
22 M 14.8 16.0 86 87 88 89 1 1
23 F 15.0 13.0 87 88 87 87 0 1
Median 86 87 87 87 1 0
Range 81 to 93 83 to 92 79 to 94 80 to 94 –2 to 10 –3 to 10
P value .177 .562 .453

aNegative values denote varus positioning. F, female; M, male.

bPatient had a 2.2-cm leg-length difference (operative > nonoperative).

cPatient demonstrated bilateral physiological valgus.

dPatient had a 1.2-cm leg-length difference (operative > nonoperative).