Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 23;9:788. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03166-3

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

pRF properties in V1–VO1 are quantitatively similar across development. a Mean pRF size in V1–VO1 across 18 children (light colors) and 23 adults (dark colors); Error bars: standard error. Gray circles: individual participant data. Each circle is a participant. b Mean pRF eccentricity in V1–VO1 of the same participants. Gray circles: individual participant data. c pRF size vs. eccentricity relationship is similar across age-groups. The line of best fit (solid line) and the standard error (shaded region) illustrates the relationship between pRF eccentricity and size in units of degrees of visual angle (dva). Adults are shown in dark colors (n = 23), children (n = 18) in light colors (each age group is shown in a separate graph in Supplementary Fig. 7). Fits are calculated in each participant, slopes and intercepts are then averaged across participants. d Visual field coverage of V1–VO1 computed using the average maximum pRF density coverage for each participant and then averaged across participants. Maps are averaged across hemispheres by flipping the right hemisphere data. Top: children. Bottom: adults. Number of participants is indicated in the top-left of each panel. Inner to outermost ring segments correspond to 2.4, 4.7, and 7 degrees of visual angle (dva)