Table 1.
LEO | LMIC/humanitarian | Combat | ICE | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Description | Use of LEO as analogue for interplanetary travel research | Resource-poor setting with lack of equipment and medical expertise | Out of hospital austere setting, high prevalence of severe trauma and blast injuries | Expeditions in environments such as: mountain, high altitude, polar, jungle, desert |
Volume of surgical proceduresa | Nil | High | High | Low |
Technological and equipment constraints | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ |
Human constraints | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ |
Patient physiological alterations | ++ secondary to exposure to microgravity | ± | Soldiers are healthy individuals before injury | ± (possible hypoxia, hypo/hyperthermia) |
Limitations for applicability to SEM | No experience of surgery or anaesthesia. Lacks total isolation (option to evacuate, real-time telemedicine) | Does not provide microgravity and/or radiation exposures. Anaesthesia providers very different from astronaut population | Does not provide microgravity and/or radiation exposures. Pathology nearly exclusively traumatic. Well trained providers | Does not provide microgravity and/or radiation exposures |
LEO low earth orbit, LMIC low and middle income country, ICE isolated and confined environment
+: present; ++: important; +++: major
askill erosion is not expected in environments with a high caseload