Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192903

Table 2. Overview of absolute and body-mass normalized peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) (mean ± SE [95% CI]) and level of evidence within the separate sitting sports disciplines.

Sports disciplines are presented in order of absolute VO2peak values, from high to low.

Number of athletes Absolute VO2peak
± SE (L∙min-1) [95% CI]
Number of athletes Body-mass normalized VO2peak
± SE (mL∙kg-1∙min-1) [95% CI]
Level of evidence
1 Nordic sit skiing 24 2.9 ± 0.3 [2.2–3.5]WB, AS, WT, WRA, WF, WTT, SH, WRU 24 45.6 ± 5.1 [35.6–55.6] HC, WB, AS, WT, WRA, WF, WTT, SH, WRU moderate
2 Para ice hockey 46 2.7 ± 0.3 [2.0–3.3]AS, WT, WRA, WF, WTT, SH, WRU - - limited
3 Hand cycling 30 2.6 ± 0.2 [2.2–3.1]AS, WT, WRA, WF, WTT, SH, WRU 30 36.0 ± 4.3 [27.4–44.5] NS, WRA, WF, WTT, SH, WRU moderate
4 Wheelchair basketball 209 2.5 ± 0.1 [2.3–2.7] NS, AS, WT, WRA, WF, WTT, SH, WRU 158 34.5 ± 1.8 [30.9–38.1] NS, WRA, WF, WTT, SH, WRU strong
5 Alpine sit skiing 21 2.3 ± 0.2 [1.9–2.7] NS, PIH, HC, WTT, SH, WRU 21 33.1 ± 4.8 [23.6–42.5] NS, WRA, SH, WRU moderate
6 Wheelchair tennis 23 2.2 ± 0.2 [1.8–2.6] NS, PIH, HC, WTT, SH, WRU 23 33.0 ± 2.3 [28.6–37.4] NS, WRA, SH, WRU strong
7 Wheelchair racing 179 2.2 ± 0.2 [1.9–2.5] NS, PIH, HC, WB, WTT, SH, WRU 110 39.6 ± 1.9 [35.9–43.3] NS, HC, WB, AS, WT, WF, WTT, SH, WRU strong
8 Wheelchair fencing 10 2.2 ± 0.5 [1.2–3.1] NS, PIH, HC, SH, WRU 10 31.0 ± 3.8 [23.4–38.6] NS, WRA, SH, WRU moderate
9 Wheelchair table tennis 7 1.8 ± 0.7 [0.5–3.1] NS, PIH, HC, WB 7 29.2 ± 8.7 [12.0–46.3] NS, WRA, SH, WRU moderate
10 Shooting 8 1.4 ± 0.2 [1.0–1.9] NS, PIH, HC, WB, AS, WT, WF, WRA 8 17.3 ± 3.5 [10.3–24.2] NS, HC, WB, AS, WT, WF, WTT moderate
11 Wheelchair rugby 114 1.3 ± 0.1 [1.1–1.5] NS, PIH, HC, WB, AS, WT, WF, WRA, WTT 95 18.9 ± 1.6 [15.9–22.0] NS, HC, WB, AS, WT, WF, WTT strong/moderate

Labels in superscript indicate significant differences to the respective sports discipline

The level of evidence with two attributes refers to absolute/body-mass normalized mean values, respectively. The results of the assessment of methodological quality need to be considered cautiously given the lack of empirical evidence that supports these. Note: several factors such as sex, age, body mass, disabilities, training status and test modes are grouped together in this overview table. Data of athletes with TETRA was excluded from the calculations of all sports discipline means except for wheelchair rugby.