Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0193447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193447

Table 5. Correlational analysis of patients’ characteristics and Spinal appearance questionnaire.

Characteristics SAQ domains
General Curve Prominence Trunk
shift
Waist Shoulders Kyphosis Chest Total score
Brace application [hours/day] rs = 0.15
p = 0.433
rs = 0.10
p = 0.613
rs = -0.17
p = 0.364
rs = 0.18
p = 1.000
rs = -0.17
p = 0.356
rs = -0.12
p = 0.537
rs = 0.15
p = 0.415
rs = -0.18
p = 0.335
rs = -0.08
p = 0.661
Brace application [months] rs = -0.14
p = 0.460
rs = 0.20
p = 0.295
rs = -0.24
p = 0.196
rs = 0.01
p = 0.744
rs = -0.36
p = 0.051
rs = -0.19
p = 0.322
rs = -0.19
p = 0.303
rs = -0.22
p = 0.251
rs = -0.17
p = 0.367
Time after completed treatment [years] rs = 0.10
p = 0.619
rs = -0.11
p = 0.566
rs = 0.06
p = 0.734
rs = 0.06
p = 0.328
rs = 0.32
p = 0.083
rs = 0.03
p = 0.869
rs = 0.01
p = 0.980
rs = 0.22
p = 0.253
rs = 0.19
p = 0.324
Body Mass Index
    Before treatment rs = 0.16
p = 0.406
rs = -0.38
p = 0.041
rs = -0.23
p = 0.215
rs = -0.07
p = 0.726
rs = 0.03
p = 0.867
rs = -0.13
p = 0.506
rs = 0.02
p = 0.911
rs = -0.19
p = 0.308
rs = -0.15
p = 0.438
    After completed treatment rs = 0.07
p = 0.724
rs = -0.14
p = 0.457
rs = -0.09
p = 0.624
rs = 0.06
p = 0.734
rs = -0.18
p = 0.329
rs = -0.18
p = 0.352
rs = -0.10
p = 0.604
rs = -0.23
p = 0.216
rs = -0.13
p = 0.506
    In present study rs = 0.15
p = 0.422
rs = 0.12
p = 0.530
rs = -0.06
p = 0.768
rs = 0.13
p = 0.494
rs = -0.11
p = 0.572
rs = -0.08
p = 0.675
rs = -0.13
p = 0.489
rs = -0.06
p = 0.762
rs = 0.03
p = 0.873
Curve type p = 0.806 p = 0.092 p = 0.153 p = 0.112 p = 0.179 p = 0.057 p = 0.026 p = 0.111 p = 0.157
Curve size of the major
curve (Cobb angle)
    Before treatment rs = 0.04
p = 0.849
rs = 0.28
p = 0.129
rs = 0.33
p = 0.175
rs = 0.33
p = 0.071
rs = 0.30
p = 0.106
rs = 0.32
p = 0.089
rs = 0.08
p = 0.661
rs = 0.42
p = 0.022
rs = 0.36
p = 0.052
    After completed treatment rs = 0.11
p = 0.485
rs = 0.28
p = 0.127
rs = 0.56*
p = 0.001
rs = 0.53*
p = 0.003
rs = 0.42
p = 0.020
rs = 0.35
p = 0.056
rs = 0.07
p = 0.700
rs = 0.47
p = 0.008
rs = 0.50*
p = 0.005
    In present study rs = 0.04
p = 0.843
rs = 0.32
p = 0.084
rs = 0.46
p = 0.011
rs = 0.48
p = 0.007
rs = 0.38
p = 0.038
rs = 0.34
p = 0.066
rs = 0.06
p = 0.769
rs = 0.46
p = 0.010
rs = 0.44
p = 0.016
Curve change from end of treatment to present study** rs = -0.21
p = 0.259
rs = 0.17
p = 0.376
rs = -0.01
p = 0.957
rs = 0.13
p = 0.493
rs = 0.01
p = 0.959
rs = 0.05
p = 0.803
rs = 0.09
p = 0.638
rs = 0.13
p = 0.506
rs = 0.02
p = 0.906
Apical translation
[cm]***
    Before treatment rs = 0.13
p = 0.485
rs = 0.05
p = 0.804
rs = 0.18
p = 0.354
rs = 0.01
p = 0.939
rs = 0.33
p = 0.077
rs = 0.41
p = 0.026
rs = -0.01
p = 0.961
rs = 0.43
p = 0.016
rs = 0.26
p = 0.161
    After completed treatment rs = 0.26
p = 0.173
rs = 0.36
p = 0.053
rs = 0.40
p = 0.032
rs = 0.44
p = 0.014
rs = 0.47
p = 0.009
rs = 0.53*
p = 0.002
rs = 0.11
p = 0.567
rs = 0.53*
p = 0.002
rs = 0.53*
p = 0.003
    In present study rs = -0.14
p = 0.470
rs = 0.38
p = 0.036
rs = 0.24
p = 0.210
rs = 0.32
p = 0.083
rs = 0.26
p = 0.172
rs = 0.23
p = 0.220
rs = 0.18
p = 0.337
rs = 0.33
p = 0.072
rs = 0.25
p = 0.184
Rib hump angle in present study rs = 0.05
p = 0.785
rs = -0.01
p = 0.984
rs = 0.67
p = 0.727
rs = 0.14
p = 0.475
rs = -0.01
p = 0.944
rs = 0.01
p = 0.943
rs = 0.18
p = 0.352
rs = 0.02
p = 0.894
rs = -0.01
p = 0.965
Rib hump height in present study [cm] rs = 0.12
p = 0.521
rs = -0.03
p = 0.870
rs = 0.06
p = 0.740
rs = 0.16
p = 0.408
rs = 0.32
p = 0.082
rs = 0.32
p = 0.008
rs = 0.11
p = 0.592
rs = 0.34
p = 0.008
rs = 0.26
p = 0.160
Thoracic kyphosis in present study [angle] rs = 0.18
p = 0.326
rs = 0.16
p = 0.393
rs = 0.04
p = 0.848
rs = 0.35
p = 0.057
rs = 0.15
p = 0.432
rs = 0.23
p = 0.214
rs = 0.39
p = 0.036
rs = 0.16
p = 0.386
rs = 0.27
p = 0.156
Lumbar lordosis in present study [angle] rs = 0.03
p = 0.900
rs = -0.21
p = 0.272
rs = 0.05
p = 0.812
rs = 0.13
p = 0.049
rs = 0.16
p = 0.410
rs = 0.09
p = 0.632
rs = 0.05
p = 0.790
rs = 0.11
p = 0.602
rs = 0.09
p = 0.634

Note

* p < 0.0056

**according to Nachemson and Peterson, success of treatment was defined as an increase in the curve of less than 6° from the start of bracing

*** the degree of the apical translation of center sacral vertical line (CSVL) according to the Harms Study Group; effect size (ES); Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ).