Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 5;28(Suppl 3):S66–S72. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170246

Table 2. Relationships among socioeconomic status and fine self-rated health in men (n = 1,178): NIPPON DATA2010.

SES N Prevalence of fine SRH Crude OR
(95% CI)
Age-adjusted OR
(95% CI)
Model 1 Model 2


Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
Educational attainmenti            
 Elementary or junior high school 290 169 (58%) 1 1 1 1
 High school 496 374 (75%) 2.19 (1.61–2.99)*** 1.58 (1.13–2.19)** 1.55 (1.10–2.20)* 1.53 (1.07–2.19)*
 University or junior college 383 306 (80%) 2.85 (2.02–4.01)*** 1.74 (1.20–2.51)** 1.76 (1.19–2.59)** 1.74 (1.15–2.62)**
Marital/living status            
 Married 953 687 (72%) 1 1 1 1
 Single, not living alone 112 93 (83%) 1.90 (1.13–3.17)* 1.07 (0.60–1.89) 1.01 (0.55–1.83) 0.93 (0.51–1.70)
 Single, living alone 113 74 (65%) 0.73 (0.49–1.11) 0.66 (0.43–1.01) 0.63 (0.40–0.99)* 0.65 (0.40–1.07)
Working status            
 Working 718 568 (79%) 1 1 1 1
 Not working, including housemaking exclusively 460 286 (62%) 0.43 (0.33–0.56)*** 0.75 (0.55–1.02) 0.75 (0.54–1.05) 0.72 (0.51–1.01)
Yearly household income, million JPYa            
 Less than 2 195 113 (58%) 1 1 1 1
 2 through 6 655 488 (75%) 2.05 (1.46–2.88)*** 1.90 (1.34–2.70)*** 1.82 (1.26–2.63)** 1.64 (1.10–2.44)*
 Greater than 6 224 178 (79%) 2.63 (1.67–4.12)*** 1.99 (1.24–3.18)** 1.84 (1.13–3.02)* 1.59 (0.94–2.70)
 Invalid response 104 75 (72%) 1.76 (1.03–2.98)* 1.56 (0.90–2.71) 1.50 (0.84–2.68) 1.38 (0.76–2.52)
Monthly equivalent household expenditureb,ii            
 1st quintile (Lowest) 217 148 (68%) 1 1 1  
 2nd quintile 244 175 (72%) 1.18 (0.79–1.76) 1.18 (0.78–1.80) 1.15 (0.74–1.79)  
 3rd quintile 238 170 (71%) 1.17 (0.78–1.74) 1.22 (0.80–1.86) 1.18 (0.76–1.83)  
 4th quintile 216 172 (80%) 1.82 (1.18–2.82)** 2.08 (1.32–3.28)** 1.91 (1.19–3.08)**  
 5th quintile (Highest) 214 156 (73%) 1.26 (0.83–1.90) 1.32 (0.86–2.03) 1.32 (0.84–2.07)  

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SES, socioeconomic status; SRH, self-rated health.

P value: *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001.

ORs were calculated using multiple logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age, having any subjective symptoms, and visiting a doctor in Model 1 and additionally adjusted for monthly equivalent household expenditure and living in their own house in Model 2.

aThe square root-transformed number of household members was adjusted.

bLiving in their own house was adjusted.

Number of missing responses: i = 9; ii = 49.