Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 5;28(Suppl 3):S66–S72. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170246

Table 3. Relationships among socioeconomic status and fine self-rated health in women (n = 1,555): NIPPON DATA2010.

SES N Prevalence of fine SRH Crude OR
(95% CI)
Age-adjusted OR
(95% CI)
Model 1 Model 2


Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
Educational attainmenti            
 Elementary or junior high school 366 213 (58%) 1 1 1 1
 High school 708 488 (69%) 1.59 (1.23–2.07)*** 1.23 (0.94–1.62) 1.14 (0.86–1.53) 1.02 (0.75–1.38)
 University or junior college 477 393 (82%) 3.36 (2.45–4.60)*** 1.95 (1.37–2.79)*** 1.87 (1.29–2.70)*** 1.65 (1.12–2.46)*
Marital/living status            
 Married 1,100 803 (73%) 1 1 1 1
 Single, not living alone 258 178 (69%) 0.82 (0.61–1.11) 0.86 (0.62–1.19) 0.84 (0.60–1.18) 0.84 (0.59–1.20)
 Single, living alone 197 114 (58%) 0.51 (0.37–0.69)*** 0.75 (0.53–1.05) 0.70 (0.49–1.00)* 0.77 (0.53–1.13)
Working status            
 Working 672 522 (78%) 1 1 1 1
 Not working, including housemaking exclusively 883 573 (65%) 0.53 (0.42–0.67)*** 0.80 (0.62–1.04) 0.81 (0.62–1.07) 0.76 (0.57–1.01)
Yearly household income, million JPYa            
 Less than 2 296 165 (56%) 1 1 1 1
 2 through 6 794 568 (72%) 1.85 (1.39–2.47)*** 1.66 (1.24–2.23)*** 1.70 (1.25–2.32)*** 1.53 (1.09–2.14)*
 Greater than 6 294 240 (82%) 3.13 (2.10–4.64)*** 2.34 (1.55–3.54)*** 2.39 (1.55–3.69)*** 2.15 (1.34–3.46)**
 Invalid response 171 122 (71%) 1.78 (1.17–2.71)** 1.71 (1.12–2.63)* 1.94 (1.24–3.04)** 2.19 (1.36–3.53)**
Equivalent monthly household expenditureb,ii            
 1st quintile (Lowest) 278 175 (63%) 1 1 1  
 2nd quintile 281 197 (70%) 1.39 (0.97–1.98) 1.26 (0.88–1.82) 1.40 (0.95–2.06)  
 3rd quintile 320 226 (71%) 1.42 (1.01–2.00)* 1.25 (0.87–1.79) 1.30 (0.89–1.90)  
 4th quintile 289 217 (75%) 1.78 (1.24–2.55)** 1.57 (1.08–2.29)* 1.74 (1.18–2.59)**  
 5th quintile (Highest) 304 224 (74%) 1.64 (1.16–2.34)** 1.48 (1.03–2.14)* 1.80 (1.22–2.65)**  

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SES, socioeconomic status; SRH, self-rated health.

P value: *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001.

ORs were calculated using multiple logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age, having any subjective symptoms, and visiting a doctor in Model 1 and additionally adjusted for monthly equivalent household expenditure and living in their own house in Model 2.

aThe square root-transformed number of household members was adjusted.

bLiving in their own house was adjusted.

Number of missing responses: i = 4; ii = 83.