Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 26.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Dec 16;45(9):1812–1823. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0398-6

Table 1.

Descriptive information on and correlations among the study variables

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1. Victimization (W1)^a	–	.47^***	.50^***	−.17^**	.09	.25^***	0	−.05	−.04	.08
2. Victimization (W2)^a		–	.56^***	−.13^*	.17^**	.22^**	.17^**	−.04	−.04	−.05
3. Victimization (W3)^a			–	−.19^**	.11	.29^***	.11	−.07	.02	−.02
4. Emotion regulation^b				–	−.01	−.10	−.08	.01	−.01	−.05
5. Pubertal status (W1)^a					–	.04	.55^***	−.13^*	.25^***	0
6. Sex						–	−.03	−.04	.19^**	.05
7. Age							–	−.16^*	.15^*	−.04
8. Time of day								–	−.60^***	.09
9. Cortisol AUC_G (W4)									–	−.06
10. sAA AUC_G (W4)										–
M	1.53	1.71	1.54	75.46	11.04		11.98		.80	3.08
SD	1.77	2.15	1.98	9.42	3.47		1.56		.28	.37

Sex was coded 0 = female, 1 = male. Biological stress measures were log transformed. Emotion Regulation was a composite of reports across Waves 1–3

^a

Reported by youth

^b

Reported by caregiver

^*

p < .05;

^**

p < .01;

^***

p < .001