Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug 30;34(3):407–417. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1236-6

Table 4.

Average values for each method as well as the difference and correlation between methods for the Tetralogy of Fallot Patients. LV and RV are the left and right ventricles respectively. EDV is the End-diastolic volume, ESV is the End-Systolic volume, SV is stroke volume and EF is the ejection fraction.

Manual analysis average Biventricular tool average Difference between methods PPMCC
LV EDV (ml) 148.2 ± 43.6 145.3 ± 41.9 2.9 ± 8.8(2.0%) 0.979
LV ESV (ml) 64.4 ± 22.9 70.2 ± 22.5 −5.8 ± 9.6(−8.6%) 0.911
LV mass (g) 105.9 ± 34.6 127.4 ± 35.3 −21.5 ± 9.1(−18.4%) 0.966
LV SV (ml) 83.8 ± 27.3 75.1 ± 22.3 8.7 ± 10.6(−11.0%) 0.929
LV EF (%) 56.7 ± 7.7 1.9 ± 5.0 4.8 ± 5.9(8.9%) 0.644
RV EDV (ml) 255.0 ± 83.9 242.6 ± 77.6 12.4 ± 18.4(5.0%) 0.977
RV ESV (ml) 142.3 ± 54.9 151.7 ± 54.5 −9.4 ± 18.8(−6.4%) 0.941
RV mass (g) 61.2 ± 19.6 93.3 ± 26.9 −32.2 ± 11.0(−41.6%) 0.936
RV SV (ml) 112.7 ± 39.8 90.9 ± 30.0 21.8 ± 17.1(21.4%) 0.918
RV EF (%) 44.9 ± 8.8 38.0 ± 6.1 6.9 ± 6.4(16.7%) 0.685