Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 21;10:89–100. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S124520

Table 2.

Prospective studies on impact of Oncotype DX®

Study Year Publication Country Size Node negative Node positive Percentage treatment change
Pestalozzi et al65 2017 BMC Cancer Switzerland 222 Yes N1 15% (low-risk group)
32% (non-low-risk group)
Loncaster et al69 2017 European Journal of Surgical Oncology UK 201 Yes N1 63.2% (only CHT to HT)
Kuchel et al67 2016 British Journal of Cancer UK 137 Yes N1 40.70%
Ozmen et al70 2016 Cureus Turkey 165 Yes N1mic 33%
Albanell et al68 2016 European Journal of Cancer France, Germany, Spain, UK 527 Yes N0 32%
Leung et al71 2016 Clinical Breast Cancer Hong Kong 146 Yes N1mic 23.30%
Lee et al72 2015 Cancer Research and Treatment South Korea 212 Yes N1mic 54.20%
Gligorov et al74 2015 The Oncologist France 95 Yes N1mic 37%
Bargallo et al75 2015 Journal of Surgical Oncology Mexico 96 Yes N1 32%
Yamauchi et al54 2014 BMC Health Services Research Japan 90 Yes N1 37.80%
de Boer et al64 2013 The Medical Journal of Australia Australia 151 Yes N1 23.80%
Davidson et al73 2013 European Journal of Cancer Canada 150 Yes No 30%
Holt et al77 2013 British Journal of Cancer UK 142 Yes N1mic 26.80%
Eiermann et al76 2013 Annals of Oncology Germany 366 Yes N1 33.10%
Lo et al63 2010 Journal of Clinical Oncology USA 89 Yes No 31.00%
Oratz et al66 2007 Journal of Oncology Practice USA 68 Yes No 21%

Note: Data from references 6377.

Abbreviations: CHT, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy; HT, hormonal therapy.