Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 21;5(2):1700131. doi: 10.1002/advs.201700131

Figure 2.

Figure 2

a) The XRD (X‐ray diffraction) patterns, b) the enlarged comparison of (110) diffraction peak, c) the steady‐state photoluminescence (PL) spectra, and d) time‐resolved photoluminescence (TR‐PL) spectroscopy based on the glass/perovskite structure with Na+, K+ doped and the control sample without doping. e,f) The element distribution of Na+, K+ doped perovskite absorber layer measured by SIMS (secondary ion mass spectrometer) (note that the contents of Na and K were quantified by the Si standard while the other element contents were recorded as the raw ion counts).