Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 8;16(2):453–506. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003185

Table 2.

Results of critical appraisal for appraising descriptive studies

Citation Q1Random allocation Q2Clearly defined inclusion criteria Q3 Confounding factors accounted for Q4Objective assessment Q5Description of compared groups Q6Appropriate follow-up time Q7Withdrawals accounted for Q8Reliable outcome measures Q9Appropriate statistical analysis Total
Haghighat et al. 201375 N Y Y ? N/A N ? Y Y 3/7
Hwang et al. 201379 N Y Y Y Y Y N/A Y Y 6/8
% 0 100 100 50 100 50 0 100 100

? = unclear; N = no; N/A = not applicable; Y = yes.