Table 2.
Results of critical appraisal for appraising descriptive studies
Citation | Q1Random allocation | Q2Clearly defined inclusion criteria | Q3 Confounding factors accounted for | Q4Objective assessment | Q5Description of compared groups | Q6Appropriate follow-up time | Q7Withdrawals accounted for | Q8Reliable outcome measures | Q9Appropriate statistical analysis | Total |
Haghighat et al. 201375 | N | Y | Y | ? | N/A | N | ? | Y | Y | 3/7 |
Hwang et al. 201379 | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N/A | Y | Y | 6/8 |
% | 0 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
? = unclear; N = no; N/A = not applicable; Y = yes.