Table 2.
Characteristics | Respondents N = 58 (%) |
---|---|
Profession | |
Physician | 22 (37.9) |
Physician/methodological expert | 10 (17.2) |
Methodological expert | 10 (17.2) |
Other | 16 (27.6) |
Knowledge of the AGREE II instrument | |
Yes | 51 (87.9) |
No | 7 (12.1) |
Performance of appraisals using the AGREE I or II instrument | |
Yes | 49 (84.5) |
No | 9 (15.5) |
Number of appraised guidelines using the AGREE I or II instrumenta | |
< 10 guidelines | 27 (46.6) |
10–20 guidelines | 9 (15.5) |
> 20 guidelines | 13 (22.4) |
Experience in yearsa | |
< 1 year | 6 (10.3) |
1–5 years | 35 (60.3) |
> 5 years | 8 (13.8) |
Involvement in guideline development | |
Yes | 35 (60.3) |
No | 23 (39.7) |
Purpose of conducting appraisals using the AGREE I or II instrumentb | |
Assessment of guideline quality | 24 (41.4) |
Development of guidelines | 7 (12.1) |
Writing of guideline synopses | 7 (12.1) |
Research | 3 (5.2) |
Adaptation of guidelines | 2 (3.4) |
Application in clinical practice | 2 (3.4) |
Further training | 2 (3.4) |
Development of knowledge tools | 1 (1.7) |
Publication of scientific articles | 1 (1.7) |
Project work | 1 (1.7) |
Updating of guidelines | 1 (1.7) |
No response | 5 (8.6) |
aNine survey respondents (15.5%) did not answer this question
bThe question was formulated as an open question; we summarized the response options presented here from the individual responses given. Some of the respondents provided more than one response