Table 2.
Binary Logistic Regression to Predict Respondents’ Intention to Seek Cervical Cancer Screening based on Perceived Scales
| Variables | n (%) | Β | Wald | p-value | OR | 95% CI for OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Cues | |||||||
| High | 124(23) | 1.25 | 7.53 | 0.006 | 3.48 | 1.43 | 8.49 |
| Low (Ref.) | 416(77) | ||||||
| Perceived Seriousness | |||||||
| High | 272(50) | 0.71 | 7.96 | 0.005 | 2.02 | 1.24 | 3.30 |
| Low (Ref.) | 268(50) | ||||||
| Perceived Benefits | |||||||
| High | 269(50) | 0.52 | 4.59 | 0.032 | 1.68 | 1.05 | 2.71 |
| Low (Ref.) | 271(50) | ||||||
| Perceived Barriers | |||||||
| High | 127(24) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.969 | 1.01 | 0.54 | 1.88 |
| Low (Ref.) | 412(76) | ||||||
| Perceived Susceptibility | |||||||
| High | 82(15) | 0.94 | 3.46 | 0.063 | 2.57 | 0.95 | 6.93 |
| Low (Ref.) | 458(85) | ||||||
| Constant | 2.16 | 35.35 | 0.001 | 8.70 | |||