Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 27;11:17. doi: 10.1186/s13048-018-0389-9

Table 3.

Associations between COX expression levels and ovarian cancer survival, the Vanderbilt TROC

Disease-free survival (DFS), hazard ratio (95% CI), P-value Overall survival (OS), hazard ratio (95% CI), P-value
IHC1 H-Score2 QPCR3 IHC1 H-Score2 QPCR3
COX-1 / PTGS1
 N cases / eventsa 47 / 15 vs 71 / 42 60 / 26 vs 58 / 31 15 / 12 vs 17 / 13 77 / 43 vs 113 / 77 95 / 57 vs 95 / 63 24 / 19 vs 25 / 18
 Unadjusted 2.34 (1.30–4.24) 0.005 1.49 (0.88–2.50) 0.138 1.77 (0.79–3.98) 0.168 1.13 (0.78–1.65) 0.515 1.09 (0.76–1.56) 0.647 1.17 (0.61–2.23) 0.641
 Adjustedb 1.58 (0.85–2.94) 0.148 1.44 (0.85–2.43) 0.180 4.12 (1.51–11.26) 0.006 0.79 (0.54–1.16) 0.227 0.97 (0.68–1.40) 0.882 2.02 (0.96–4.22) 0.063
 Adjustedc 1.55 (0.81–2.98) 0.187 1.30 (0.75–2.34) 0.356 6.37 (1.84–22.01) 0.003 0.87 (0.59–1.30) 0.495 1.14 (0.78–1.65) 0.504 2.26 (1.04–4.91) 0.039
COX-2 / PTGS2
 N cases / events 50 / 33 vs 68 / 24 46 / 29 vs 72 / 28 10 / 10 vs 14 / 9 103 / 80 vs 87 / 40 95 / 72 vs 95 / 48 18 / 16 vs 18 / 11
 Unadjusted 0.51 (0.30–0.87) 0.013 0.61 (0.36–1.02) 0.061 0.51 (0.20–1.29) 0.154 0.52 (0.36–0.77) < 0.001 0.57 (0.39–0.82) 0.002 0.59 (0.27–1.27) 0.173
 Adjustedb 1.53 (0.85–2.76) 0.160 1.93 (1.08–3.46) 0.028 0.86 (0.30–2.45) 0.772 0.85 (0.57–1.27) 0.420 0.89 (0.61–1.31) 0.559 0.77 (0.35–1.71) 0.519
 Adjustedc 1.54 (0.84–2.80) 0.161 1.92 (1.06–3.49) 0.033 0.87 (0.31–2.47) 0.798 1.05 (0.69–1.59) 0.818 1.05 (0.71–1.56) 0.802 1.40 (0.56–3.51) 0.477

1COX protein measured by immunohistochemistry: moderate & strong vs weak

2COX protein measured by H-Score: dichotomized at median

3COX gene expression measured by quantitative real-time PCR: dichotomized at median

aN cases / N events, reference vs high COX

bAdjusted for age at diagnosis (continuous), stage (early, late), and tumor type (I, II)

cAdditionally adjusted for debulking (optimal, suboptimal, missing) and platinum sensitivity (sensitive, resistant, missing) Bold values denote signficant associations; column percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding error