Table 2.
For each significant mediation effect, the full model statistics are reported for the regression models used to calculate paths b1, b2 and cā, which included age, CT and GM volume as dependent variables and site and svol as confounding variables.
Ultra-SWA | ||
---|---|---|
ROI | Hem | Full model statistics |
FG | L | R2= 0.48, F(5,126)=23.56, p<0.001 |
IPC | L | R2= 0.51, F(5,126)=26.51, p<0.001 |
R | R2= 0.51, F(5,126)=26.54, p<0.001 | |
LOC | L | R2= 0.49, F(5,126)=23.78, p<0.001 |
R | R2= 0.50, F(5,126)=24.96, p<0.001 | |
PCL | R | R2= 0.49, F(5,126)=23.79, p<0.001 |
PC | R | R2= 0.54, F(5,126)=29.83, p<0.001 |
SFG | R | R2= 0.49, F(5,126)=23.84, p<0.001 |
| ||
Delta-SWA | ||
ROI | Hem | Full model statistics |
| ||
IPC | L | R2= 0.57, F(5,126)=33.70, p<0.001 |
LOC | R | R2= 0.56, F(5,126)=31.48, p<0.001 |
SFG | L | R2= 0.56, F(5,126)=32.10, p<0.001 |
R | R2= 0.56, F(5,126)=31.50, p<0.001 |