Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 23;9:309. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00309

Table 4.

Association between TLR10 tagSNPs and risk of TB in ATAPC.

SNP Additive model
Dominant model
Recessive model
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
rs10004195 0.870 (0.742–1.020) 0.086 0.772 (0.602–0.991) 0.042 0.905 (0.689–1.187) 0.470
rs11096956 0.836 (0.711–0.985) 0.032 0.825 (0.653–1.042) 0.106 0.732 (0.536–1.001) 0.051
rs11466617 0.691 (0.578–0.826) 4.86 × 10−5 0.696 (0.555–0.873) 0.002 0.434 (0.280–0.671) 1.77 × 10−4
rs11466655 0.956 (0.767–1.191) 0.686 0.920 (0.722–1.173) 0.501 1.372 (0.604–3.116) 0.449
rs4129009 0.748 (0.622–0.903) 0.002 0.735 (0.619–0.902) 0.008 0.565 (0.343–0.931) 0.025
rs11096957 1.100 (0.930–1.302) 0.267 1.123 (0.886–1.424) 0.337 1.144 (0.829–1.578) 0.414
rs11466653 1.287 (1.008–1.643) 0.043 1.285 (0.983–1.678) 0.066 1.977 (0.737–5.306) 0.176

P-values significant after Bonferroni correction (P < 0.0071) are shown in bold.

SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

P-values were calculated using multivariate logistic regression with age and gender set as covariates.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure