Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 27;9:844. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03234-8

Table 1.

Crystallographic data and refinement statistics

Data collectiona
PARP-1 CAT∆HD with BAD
Space group P1
Unit cell dimensions a = 44.5 Å b = 75.4 Å, c = 85.6 Å α = 98.7°, β = 104.9°, γ = 106.7°
Four molecules/asymmetric unit
Wavelength (Å) 1.01
Resolution range (Å) 50.0–2.3 (2.39–2.30)
Completeness (%) 97.8 (97.3)
Average redundancy 4.8 (4.9)
Mean (II)b 13.2 (1.6)
Rmerge (%)b 5.7 (111.7)
Rpim (%)b 2.9 (56.5)
Mean I CC(1/2)b 0.999 (0.707)
Model refinementa
 Resolution range (Å) 20.0–2.3 (2.36–2.3)
 Number of reflections 41,185 (3037)
 Rcrystc 0.199 (0.325)
 Rfreec 0.222 (0.313)
 Number of atoms/average B-factor (Å2) 7774/76.4
  Protein 7499/76.8
  Solvent 72/62.5
  BAD 203/69.1
Phi/Psi, preferred (%)/outliers (#)d 97.6/0
R.m.s.d. bond angles (°) 1.488
R.m.s.d. bond lengths (Å) 0.010

a Values in parentheses refer to data in the highest resolution shell

b As calculated in SCALA36: Rmerge = ∑hkljIj − 〈I〉∣ / ∑hklj Ij. 〈I〉 is the mean intensity of j observations of reflection hkl and its symmetry equivalents; Rpim takes into account measurement redundancy when calculating Rmerge; Mean I CC(1/2) is the correlation between mean intensities calculated for two randomly chosen half-sets of the data

c Rcryst = ∑hklFobskFcalc∣/ ∑hklFobs∣. Rfree = Rcryst for 5% of reflections excluded from crystallographic refinement

d As reported in COOT34