Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 13;20(2):e56. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8987

Table 2.

Comparisons of demographics, learning model, outcomes, satisfaction, and experience between classical cognitive styles.

Variables Classical field-dependent, N=5 Classical field-independent, N=55 P valuea
Demographics



Age in years, median (IQRb) 23 (22-24) 23 (23-24) .45

Male sex, n (%) 2 (40) 34 (62) .38

Group embedded figures test score, median (IQR) 9 (4-12) 18 (17-18) <.001
Learning model



Interactive multimedia, n (%) 3 (60) 28 (51) >.99
Learning outcomes



Multiple-choice questions-before, median (IQR) 40 (25-60) 40 (40-50)c .53

Multiple-choice questions-after, median (IQR) 60 (50-80) 70 (60-80)c .70

Percentage change in multiple-choice question, median (IQR) 67 (−7 to 200) 50 (17-80)d .90

Multimedia situational test-before, median (IQR) 80 (50-100) 80 (60-80)c .63

Multimedia situational test-after, median (IQR) 80 (70-90) 80 (80-100)c .92

Percentage change in multimedia situational test, median (IQR) 0 (−30 to 92) 25 (0-33)d .68
Learning satisfaction



Global satisfaction score, median (IQR) 6 (4-7) 7 (5-9)d .25

aMann-Whiney U test (continuous variables) or Fisher exact test (categorical variables).

bIQR: interquartile range.

cP<.05, before versus after, Wilcoxon signed-rank test (two-tailed).

dP<.05, compared with a neutral value (“0” for multiple-choice question and multimedia situational test, or “5” for “global satisfaction score”), Wilcoxon signed-rank test (two-tailed).