Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 13;20(2):e56. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8987

Table 3.

Comparisons of demographics, learning models, outcomes, satisfaction, and experience among modified cognitive styles.

Variables Modified field-dependent, N=15 Modified field-intermediate, N=17 Modified field-independent, N=28 P valuea
Demographics




Age in years, median (IQRb) 23 (22-24) 23 (23-24) 23 (23-24) .74

Male sex, n (%) 8 (53) 12 (71) 16 (57) .56
Cognitive style




Group embedded figures test score, median (IQR) 14 (12-15) 17 (17-17) 18 <.001
Learning module




Interactive multimedia, n (%) 8 (53) 7 (41) 15 (54) .69
Learning outcomes




Multiple-choice questions-before, median (IQR) 50 (30-60)c 40 (40-50)c 40 (40-50)c .47

Multiple-choice questions-after, median (IQR) 70 (60-80)c 70 (65-80)c 70 (53-70)c .48

Percentage change in multiple-choice question, median (IQR) 40 (17-100)d 75 (33-100)d 45 (15-75)d .34

Multimedia situational test-before, median (IQR) 80 (60-80)c 80 (60-80)c 70 (60-80)c .74

Multimedia situational test-after, median (IQR) 80 (80-80)c 80 (70-100)c 80 (63-95)c .83

Percentage change in multimedia situational test, median (IQR) 25 (0-33)d 25 (0-29)d 0.0 (0-37)d .82
Learning satisfaction




Global satisfaction score, median (IQR) 6 (3-7) 8 (7-10)d 7 (5-8)d .02

aMann-Whiney U test (continuous variables) or Fisher exact test (categorical variables).

bIQR: interquartile range.

cP<.05, before versus after, Wilcoxon signed-rank test (two-tailed).

dP<.05, compared with a neutral value (“0” for multiple-choice question and multimedia situational test, or “5” for “global satisfaction score”), Wilcoxon signed-rank test (two-tailed).