Table 1. RMSD and INF scores of the predicted tetraloops.
| Structure | RMSD (Å) | INF | INFwc | INFnc | INFbph |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCAA | 1.4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| GAAA | 1.7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| GAGA | 1.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| GCGA | 1.8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| GGAA | 2.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| GGGA | 1.3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| GUAA | 1.3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| GUGA | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| UUCG | 0.9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| UUCG(χpc) | 2.7 | 0.86 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| CUUG(s) | 1.8 | 0.94 | 1 | - | 0 |
| CUUG(χpc) | 3.5 | 0.7 | 0.81 | 0 | - |
Results for the tetraloop simulations allowing the change of sugar pucker and χ angle conformation. Results forcing these parameters to the C3′-endo and anti conformation in all the nucleotides are denoted with (χpc). Also, the second best result for CUUG is denoted by (s), and included for completeness.