Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 3;8(2):e017786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017786

Table 3.

The patient’s response to their perceived potentially harmful preventable problem and the primary care service involved for problems occurring in the last 12 months

Primary care service All reported problems Clinician ranked ‘possibly or higher’ (lower threshold)
 All services 132 71
 GP surgery 97 (73%) 61 (86%)
 Out of hours care/A&E/ambulance 4 (3%) 1 (1%)
 Walk-in clinic 2 (2%) 0
 Dental surgery 4 (3%) 1 (1%)
 Pharmacy 7 (5%) 6 (8%)
 Community or district nursing 4 (3%) 0
 Opticians 2 (2%) 1 (1%)
Mental health services 1 (1%) 0
Missing 11 (8%) 1 (1%)
Did you discuss the problem with primary care staff?
 All respondents 132 71
 Yes—discussed with primary care staff 56 (42%) 42 (59%)
 No—did not discuss with primary care staff 67 (51%) 29 (41%)
 Missing 9 (7%) 0
Reason not discussed with primary care staff
 All not discussing problem 67 29
 Did not feel comfortable to discuss the problem 16 (24%) 8 (28%)
 Could not find anybody with whom to discuss the problem 21 (31%) 10 (34%)
 Unconcerned about the problem 7 (10%) 5 (17%)
 Did not notice the problem at the time (or too ill) 11 (16%) 4 (14%)
 Other 5 (7%) 2 (7%)
 Missing 7 (10%) 0
Profession of discussant
 All discussing problem 56 42
 GP 28 (50%) 19 (45%)
 Practice manager 5 (9%) 5 (21%)
 Receptionist 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
 Practice nurse 6 (11%) 5 (12%)
 Pharmacist or dispenser 7 (13%) 7 (17%)
 General dental practitioner 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
 Dietician 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
 Missing 5 (9%) 3 (7%)
Role of discussant in patient’s care
 Member of staff directly involved 23 (41%) 16 (38%)
 Another member of staff at same institution 25 (45%) 20 (48%)
 Above unclear 8 (14%) 6 (14%)

A&E, accident and emergency; GP, general practitioner.