Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 15;26(3):840–852. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0155

Table 2.

Sound targets treated under prosodic variation and no prosodic variation conditions with effect size calculated on generalization probes pre- and posttreatment.

Participant Prosodic variation
No prosodic variation
Targets Pretreatment
Posttreatment
% change d 2 Targets Pretreatment
Posttreatment
% change d 2
M % M % M % M %
Danica /ɹ/ rhyme 0.7 0.9 80.9 2.5 79.2 46.35 /ɹ/ onset 2.1 (2.3) 2.3 85.3 2.3 83.2 36.64
Ethan /ɹ/ rhyme 1.2 1.1 93.6 5.6 92.4 27.5 /ɹ/ onset 12.5 (7.2) 7.2 84.5 9.4 72.0 8.71
Finn /ɹ/ onset 2.8 2.7 19.5 5.8 16.7 3.82 /ɹ/ rhyme 1.2 1.0 8.4 7.3 7.2 1.75
Greg /ɹ/ rhyme 0.2 0.3 14.4 8.7 14.2 3.15 /ɹ/ onset 18.5 8.9 41.2 22.7 22.7 1.42
Hannah /ɹ/ onset 4.1 3.0 18.3 9.6 14.2 2.27 /ɹ/ rhyme 0.5 1.0 4.7 4.5 4.2 1.51
Isaac /ɹ/ onset 1.3 0.7 13.4 5.3 12.1 4.00 /s/ rhyme 28.0 6.7 25.4 20.9 −3.6 −0.19
Mean (95% CI) 1.7 40.0 38.1 [8.4,67.9] 14.52 [−0.2,29.2] 10.5 41.6 31.0 [1.1,60.8] 8.31 [−3.1,19.7]

Note.d2 = mean difference of the immediate three to five pretreatment values and three to five posttreatment values, divided by the pooled standard deviation of these pre- and posttreatment values.