Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 17;41(3):522–530. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1983

Table 4.

Categorized duration of breastfeeding and timing of introduction of complementary foods and risk of IA (any IA or GADA)

IA Dietary exposure* Timing in months* Number of children who developed any IA or GADA, N (%) Number of children who did not develop any IA or GADA, N (%) Unadjusted HR (95% CI) P value Adjusted HR (95% CI) P value
Any IA Gluten-containing cereals <4 28 (6) 445 (94) 0.68 (0.47, 0.99) 0.047 0.67 (0.54, 0.98) 0.037
4–9 637 (10) 6,048 (90) 1 1
>9 31 (14) 185 (86) 1.57 (1.07, 2.31) 0.022 1.44 (0.97, 2.16) 0.074
Any breastfeeding ≤7 334 (9) 3,575 (91) 0.93 (0.80, 1.08) 0.326 0.94 (0.81, 1.09) 0.426
>7 360 (11) 3,042 (89) 1 1
Cow’s milk ≤5 584 (10) 5,922(91) 0.83 (0.68, 1.00) 0.055 0.85 (0.69, 1.04) 0.115
>5 117 (11) 902 (89) 1 1
Cereals ≤4 483 (9) 4,765 (91) 0.99 (0.85, 1.17) 0.945 1.09 (0.92, 1.30) 0.309
>4 216 (10) 2,045 (90) 1 1
Rice ≤7 618 (9) 6,196 (91) 0.79 (0.63, 0.99) 0.046 0.87 (0.69, 1.10) 0.233
>7 75 (13) 502 (87) 1 1
Fruit and berries ≤4 460 (9) 4,552 (91) 0.99 (0.85, 1.15) 0.868 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) 0.999
>4 240 (10) 2,254 (90) 1 1
Potato ≤7 578 (10) 5,345 (90) 1.19 (0.98, 1.45) 0.077 0.98 (0.77, 1.25) 0.898
>7 121 (8) 1,353 (92) 1 1
Meat ≤8 615 (10) 5,762 (90) 1.27 (1.01, 1.59) 0.040 1.13 (0.88, 1.45) 0.344
>8 77 (8) 914 (92) 1 1
Egg ≤9 282 (9) 3,002 (91) 0.86 (0.74, 0.99) 0.045 0.84 (0.72, 0.99) 0.035
>9 402 (10) 3,456 (90) 1 1
GADA Any breastfeeding ≤6 120 (3) 3,476 (97) 1.20 (0.95, 1.52) 0.126 1.17 (0.92, 1.49) 0.196
>6 174 (5) 3,541 (95) 1 1
Rice ≤6 264 (4) 6,435 (96) 1.25 (0.87, 1.78) 0.224 1.10 (0.76, 1.58) 0.623
>6 28 (4) 664 (96) 1 1
Fish and seafood ≤9 188 (4) 4,538 (96) 0.88 (0.70, 1.12) 0.290 1.11 (0.81, 1.53) 0.507
>9 92 (4) 2,054 (96) 1 1

*Dietary exposure: timing of breastfeeding or food; categorization of timing of gluten-containing cereals’ introductions was based on martingale residuals whereas dichotomizations of timing of other dietary exposures in relation to the risk of any IA or GADA were based on change-point methods using log-rank test (28); only statistically significant (P < 0.05) cut points are shown. No statistically significant cut point of timing of a dietary exposure for IAA was detected.

†The Cox regression model was adjusted for country, HLA genotype, FDR status, sex of the child, and probiotic use <28 days.