Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 24;596(5):901–919. doi: 10.1113/JP275317

Figure 4. Suppression of SST IN activity reduces evoked LLD magnitude.

Figure 4

A, example traces of membrane hyperpolarization induced by light activation of Arch (left) and superimposed traces showing SST cell responses to a depolarizing current injection with and without light activation (right). The SST IN was hyperpolarized by illumination and AP initiation blocked. B, superimposed traces of electrically evoked activity recorded from a PYR (top) and IN (bottom) with or without concurrent slice illumination in control aCSF (left) and after 4AP + EAA blockers wash‐on (right). Arrows indicate the time of stimulation. C, light inactivation of SST INs significantly reduced the amplitude, duration and AUC of evoked LLDs. * P < 0.05, Tukey's post hoc test. Bars indicate the timing and duration of light pulses. Each shape represents an individual cell. Error bars are the mean ± SEM. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]