Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 4;10(2):524–537. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.12.003

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of Oxygen Tension on AP+GSCs in a Serum-Free Culture System

(A) Colony morphology and AP activity (in blue) of mouse AP+GSCs under normoxia (21% O2) and hypoxia (5% and 3% O2). Cluster of mesenchymal-like cells under 1% O2 hypoxia (arrowhead). Scale bar, 100 μm.

(B) Quantification of GSC colony number and size distribution. One-way ANOVA.

(C) Bromodeoxyuridine incorporation assay of AP+GSCs under hypoxia (5% O2). The arrowheads indicate the hypoxic effect on the cell morphological transition to AP+-migrating GSC cells. Scale bars, 100 μm.

(D) Quantification of the percentage of the GSC colony with migratory cells. One-way ANOVA.

(E) Pie charts representing the GO secretome analysis of mouse AP+GSCs under normoxia (21% O2) and hypoxia (5% O2). The secretome analysis was performed using LC-MS/MS. #, proteins expressed under hypoxia only. (a) Cellular component. (b) Protein class; classes accounting for more than 10% of the total classes are labeled I–V. (c) Signaling pathway. Intrigued classifications are labeled VI–XV.

(F) Secretome protein network of AP+GSCs under hypoxia. Protein levels that were higher in the hypoxia than in the normoxia are shown.

(G) Validation of the representative LC-MS/MS-determined differentially expressed proteins in an AP+GSC colony using qRT-PCR.

Student’s t test. For all quantifications, data are the means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. See also Figure S1 and Tables S1–S4.