Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2017 Dec 19;140(1):22–25. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b09744

Table 1.

Optimization of preparative electrolysis reactions.

graphic file with name nihms942523u2.jpg
entry NHPI (mol%) R Base (equiv) Electrolyte I (equiv) % yield vs ArCH3 (vs I)
1 2.5% 4-tBu Lut, KHCO3 (0.1, 1.1) KPF6 0.1 10 (100)
2 15% 4-tBu Lut, KHCO3 (0.1, 3.3) KPF6 1.0 38 (38)
3 20% 4-tBu Lut (1.5) [LutH]ClO4a 1.0 57 (57)
4 20% 4-tBu Lut (1.5) [LutH]ClO4 1.5 52 (35)
5 20% 3-OMe Lut (1.5) [LutH]ClO4 1.0 83 (83)
6 20% Cl4NHPI 3-OMe Lut (1.5) [LutH]ClO4 1.0 71 (71)
7 20% NHSI 3-OMe Lut (1.5) [LutH]ClO4 1.0 54 (54)
8 20% Ph4NHPI 3-OMe Lut (1.5) [LutH]ClO4 1.0 78 (78)

graphic file with name nihms942523t1.jpg