Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 1;18:300. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5198-y

Table 9.

The association between public healthcare spending as percentage of GDP (column 1) and various sensitivity checks (columns 2–4)

Outcome
Public healthcare spending as % of GDP Log public healthcare spending
(1) (2) (3) (4)
FR −0.40*** −0.03* −0.03*
(0.07) (0.01) (0.01)
Level of DR
National −0.03
(0.02)
Supranational −0.07***
(0.02)
both −0.07**
(0.02)
Log population −0.48 − 0.08 0.15
(0.61) (0.15) (0.12)
Log debt −0.17* −0.03* − 0.05***
(0.08) (0.01) (0.01)
Log GDP 0.83*** 0.77*** 0.81***
(0.06) (0.05) (0.06)
Ratio of population 65 and above 0.00
(0.00)
Deficit ratio −0.01***
(0.00)
IMF bailout − 0.09 −0.04 − 0.02 −0.06**
(0.12) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02)
Constant 16.41 −10.53*** −9.83*** −14.35***
(10.47) (2.06) (1.44) (1.89)
Country FE Y Y Y Y
Year FE Y Y Y Y
N 717 717 735 631

This table presents a series of robustness checks we performed by using similar measures to replace our main model. Column 1 changes the outcome variable from inflation and PPP adjusted public healthcare spending to such spending as a percentage of total GDP. Column 2 replaces the primary variable of interest from general FR to DR. Columns 3 and 4 replaces population and debt with ratio of population 65 and above and deficit ratio

Standard errors in parentheses *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001