Table 1.
Source | Type | Vascularity | Defect Fit | Resorption | Extrusion | Infection | Resistance to hostile environments (radiation, previous infection) |
Implant Cost |
Reasons for Failure/ Reoperation |
Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autologous | Banked Orthotopic Bone Graft (“Bone Flap”) | Requires neo-vascularization | Exact fit | ↑↑↑ | – | 7–10% | ↑↓ | – | Resorption | [26–29] |
Heterotopic Bone Graft | Requires neo-vascularization | Requires intraoperative shaping | ↑↓ | – | – | ↑↑ | – | Low failure rates, Contour abnormalities secondary to resorption or initial operation | [24,27,31–33] | |
Heterotopic Vascularized Bone Flap | Vascularized | Requires intraoperative shaping | – | – | – | ↑↑↑↑ | – | Low failure rates, Contour abnormalities secondary to resorption or initial operation | [24,30] | |
Allogenic | Cadaveric Bone Graft | Requires neo-vascularization | Requires intraoperative shaping | ↑↑↑ | – | 13.2% | ↓↓↓ | ↑↑ | Infection, Resorption | [34,35] |
Alloplastic | Titanium | – | Either intraoperative shaping or exact fit with 3D printing | – | ↑↑↑ | 8.6– 29% | ↓↓↓ | ↑↑ | Extrusion, Infection | [44,45,48] |
Hydroxyapatite(Bone Cement) | – | Either intraoperative shaping or exact fit with 3D printing | – | ↑ | 22–62.5% | ↓↓↓ | ↑↑ | Infection | [48] | |
Methylmethacrylate | – | Either intraoperative shaping or exact fit with 3D printing | – | ↑ | 13–42% | ↓↓↓↓ | ↑↑ | Infection | [140] | |
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) | – | Exact fit with 3D printing | – | ? (insufficient time in clinical use) | 7.6–13% | ↓↓↓ | ↑↑↑↑↑ | Infection | [49,50] |
↑ denotes relative increase with multiple arrows denoting higher relative qualities (i.e. increased resorption or cost), ↓ denotes relative decrease with multiple arrows denoting lower relative qualities (i.e. decreased resorption or cost); ↑↓ denote equivocal depending on report; – denotes not applicable.