Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Healthc Mater. 2017 Jun 6;6(17):10.1002/adhm.201700232. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700232

Table 1.

Clinically Available Materials for Cranioplasty.

Source Type Vascularity Defect Fit Resorption Extrusion Infection Resistance to
hostile environments
(radiation, previous
infection)
Implant
Cost
Reasons
for Failure/
Reoperation
Ref.
Autologous Banked Orthotopic Bone Graft (“Bone Flap”) Requires neo-vascularization Exact fit ↑↑↑ 7–10% ↑↓ Resorption [2629]
Heterotopic Bone Graft Requires neo-vascularization Requires intraoperative shaping ↑↓ ↑↑ Low failure rates, Contour abnormalities secondary to resorption or initial operation [24,27,3133]
Heterotopic Vascularized Bone Flap Vascularized Requires intraoperative shaping ↑↑↑↑ Low failure rates, Contour abnormalities secondary to resorption or initial operation [24,30]
Allogenic Cadaveric Bone Graft Requires neo-vascularization Requires intraoperative shaping ↑↑↑ 13.2% ↓↓↓ ↑↑ Infection, Resorption [34,35]
Alloplastic Titanium Either intraoperative shaping or exact fit with 3D printing ↑↑↑ 8.6– 29% ↓↓↓ ↑↑ Extrusion, Infection [44,45,48]
Hydroxyapatite(Bone Cement) Either intraoperative shaping or exact fit with 3D printing 22–62.5% ↓↓↓ ↑↑ Infection [48]
Methylmethacrylate Either intraoperative shaping or exact fit with 3D printing 13–42% ↓↓↓↓ ↑↑ Infection [140]
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Exact fit with 3D printing ? (insufficient time in clinical use) 7.6–13% ↓↓↓ ↑↑↑↑↑ Infection [49,50]

↑ denotes relative increase with multiple arrows denoting higher relative qualities (i.e. increased resorption or cost), ↓ denotes relative decrease with multiple arrows denoting lower relative qualities (i.e. decreased resorption or cost); ↑↓ denote equivocal depending on report; – denotes not applicable.