Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0193413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193413

Fig 3. Mean CBI50 responses in each group.

Fig 3

(A) Mean CBI50 response in healthy controls before and after the combined intervention of sham control and motor sequence acquisition. (B) Mean CBI50 response in neck pain control group before and after the combined intervention of sham control and motor sequence learning. (C) Mean CBI response in spinal manipulation group before and after the combined intervention of spinal manipulation and motor sequence learning. Pre motor, prior to spinal manipulation/sham control and motor sequence acquisition; Post motor, following spinal manipulation/sham control and motor sequence acquisition. Error bars depict SEM. *P < 0.001.