Table 2. Main Findings of the Meta-analysis of Nonpharmacological Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplastya.
Variable | No. of Studies | No. of Participants | Effect Estimate (95% CI) | I2 Heterogeneity, % | GRADE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pain Relief on the VAS | |||||
CPM | 9 | 1025 | −0.05 (−0.35 to 0.25) | 52 | Very low |
1 wk | 8 | 575 | −0.27 (−0.70 to 0.16) | 35 | |
2 wk | 2 | 145 | −0.81 (−3.30 to 1.68) | 88 | |
3 mo | 2 | 170 | 0.50 (−0.30 to 1.29) | 54 | |
6 mo | 2 | 135 | 0.15 (−0.04 to 0.35) | 0 | |
Cryotherapy | 8 | 1382 | −0.51 (−1.00 to −0.02) | 62 | Very low |
Day 1 after surgery | 7 | 529 | −0.21 (−0.89 to 0.48) | 40 | |
Day 2 after surgery | 5 | 422 | −1.00 (−2.01 to 0.02) | 59 | |
Day 3 after surgery | 6 | 431 | −0.44 (−1.37 to 0.49) | 75 | |
Electrotherapy | 2 | 189 | −2.11 (−2.74 to −1.47) | 80 | Very low |
1 mo | 2 | 63 | −1.95 (−2.68 to −1.22) | 17 | |
2 mo | 2 | 63 | −2.34 (−4.49 to −0.19) | 94 | |
6 mo | 2 | 63 | −2.60 (−5.12 to −0.08) | 83 | |
Acupuncture | 3 | 230 | −0.66 (−1.29 to −0.03) | 69 | Low |
2 d | 2 | 90 | −1.14 (−1.90 to −0.38) | 0 | |
8 d | 2 | 140 | −0.37 (−1.04 to 0.30) | 72 | |
Pain Relief on the WOMAC | |||||
CPM | 5 | 578 | 0.03 (−0.19 to 0.24) | 0 | Low |
6 wk | 2 | 168 | −0.66 (−2.12 to 0.81) | 60 | |
3 mo | 3 | 242 | 0.05 (−0.22 to 0.32) | 0 | |
6 mo | 2 | 168 | −0.34 (−1.35 to 0.68) | 0 | |
Preoperative exercise | 3 | 132 | −0.14 (−1.11 to 0.84) | 65 | Low |
6 wk | 2 | 60 | 0.34 (−0.32 to 0.99) | 0 | |
12 wk | 2 | 72 | −0.78 (−1.63 to 0.07) | 8 | |
Opioid Consumptionb | |||||
CPM | 5 | 313 | 6.58 (−6.33 to 19.49) | 87 | Very low |
1 wk | 3 | 178 | 11.12 (−12.21 to 34.44) | 80 | |
2 wk | 2 | 135 | −3.78 (−7.67 to 0.11) | 8 | |
Cryotherapy within 48 h | 7 | 468 | −0.13 (−0.26 to −0.01) | 86 | Very low |
Cryotherapy vs nothing | 2 | 61 | −0.18 (−0.30 to −0.06) | 0 | |
Cryotherapy vs compression | 5 | 407 | −0.12 (−0.28 to 0.04) | 90 | |
Electrotherapy within 48 h | 2 | 99 | −3.50 (−5.90 to −1.10) | 17 | Moderate |
Acupuncture within 48 h | 2 | 123 | −0.71 (−1.44 to 0.02) | 64 | Low |
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture | 2 | 90 | −0.92 (−2.19 to 0.35) | 79 | |
Acupuncture vs nothing | 1 | 33 | −0.40 (−1.05 to 0.25) | NA | |
NSAID Consumption | |||||
Cryotherapy within 48 h | 3 | 363 | −0.75 (−1.63 to 0.12) | 95 | Very low |
Cryotherapy vs nothing | 1 | 60 | −1.90 (−2.25 to −1.55) | NA | |
Cryotherapy vs compression | 2 | 303 | −0.31 (−0.55 to −0.07) | 0 | |
Time to First PCAc | |||||
Acupuncture | 2 | 124 | 46.17 (20.84 to 71.50) | 19 | Moderate |
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture | 2 | 91 | 34.58 (−12.61 to 81.77) | 53 | |
Acupuncture vs nothing | 1 | 33 | 57.90 (16.52 to 99.28) | NA |
Abbreviations: CPM, continuous passive motion; GRADE, Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; NA, not available; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PCA, patient-controlled analgesia; VAS, visual analog scale (range, 0-10); WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index Scale (range, 0-20).
The inverse variance method was used for the statistical analyses.
Units are the mean use of morphine equivalents in milligrams at 1 and 2 weeks for CPM, the number of tablets per 48 hours for cryotherapy, and morphine equivalents in milligrams per kilogram per 48 hours for all other variables under this heading.
Units are minutes after surgery.