Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Feb 12;140(8):3103–3113. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b13803

Biphilic Organophosphorus-Catalyzed Intramolecular Csp2-H Amination: Evidence for a Nitrenoid in Catalytic Cadogan Cyclizations

Trevor V Nykaza , Antonio Ramirez , Tyler S Harrison , Michael R Luzung ‡,*, Alexander T Radosevich †,*
PMCID: PMC5831529  NIHMSID: NIHMS939395  PMID: 29389114

Abstract

A small-ring phosphacycloalkane (1,2,2,3,4,4-hexamethylphosphetane, 3) catalyzes intramolecular C–N bond forming heterocyclization of o-nitrobiaryl and –styrenyl derivatives in the presence of a hydrosilane terminal reductant. The method provides scalable access to diverse carbazole and indole compounds under operationally trivial homogeneous organocatalytic conditions, as demonstrated by 17 examples conducted on one-gram scale. In situ NMR reaction monitoring studies support a mechanism involving catalytic PIII/PV=O cycling, where tricoordinate phosphorus compound 3 represents the catalytic resting state. For the catalytic con-version of o-nitrobiphenyl to carbazole, the kinetic reaction order was determined for phosphetane catalyst 3 (first order), substrate (first order), and phenylsilane (zeroth order). For differentially 5-substituted 2-nitrobiphenyls, the transformation is accelerated by electron–withdrawing substituents (Hammett factor ρ = +1.5), consistent with the accrual of negative charge on the nitro substrate in the rate-determining step. DFT modeling of the turnover-limiting deoxygenation event implicates a rate-determining (3+1) cheletropic addition between the phosphetane catalyst 3 and 2-nitrobiphenyl substrate to form an unobserved pentacoordinate spiro-bicyclic dioxazaphosphetane, which decomposes via (2+2) cycloreversion giving one equivalent of phosphetane P-oxide 3•[O] and 2-nitrosobiphenyl. Experimental and computational investigations into the C–N bond forming event suggest the involvement of an oxazaphosphirane (2+1) adduct between 3 and 2-nitrosobiphenyl, which evolves through loss of phosphetane P-oxide 3•[O] to give the observed carbazole product via C–H insertion in a nitrene-like fashion.

Table of Contents artwork

graphic file with name nihms939395u1.jpg

1. Introduction

Nitrogen containing heterocyclic compounds, such as carbazoles and indoles, are important synthetic targets due to their prevalence in bioactive natural metabolites and pharmaceuticals,1 as well as their application in functional optoelectronic materials.2 Accordingly, numerous synthetic methods exist for their production. Among the methods to synthesize carbazoles1a,3 and indoles,4 those involving direct cyclization via C–H amination are attractive.5 The carbazole-/indole-forming method of Sundberg, involving heterocyclization by thermolysis or photolysis of o-azidonitrobiaryls and o-azidostyrenes and proceeding via an arylnitrene C–H insertion pathway,6 exemplifies the efficiency of this bond construction (Figure 1A). Transition metal catalysts have more recently been found to bring about similar transformations of such azide substrates under milder thermal conditions,7 although the inherent hazards associated with the preparation and handling of azide containing intermediates represent a practical constraint for such protocols on process synthesis scales.8

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Intramolecular Csp2–H amination reactions. (A) Classical Sundberg and Cadogan reactions. (B) Transition metal catalyzed carbazole-/indole-formation. (C) Catalytic Cadogan cyclization operating through a PIII/PV=O redox cycle.

By way of complement, Cadogan has extensively documented that qualitatively similar azacyclizations can be driven by phosphine-mediated exhaustive deoxygenation of o-functionalized nitrobenzene derivatives (Figure 1A).9 Chief advantages of this chemistry comprise the ease with which the aryl nitro moiety is installed and transformed in synthesis,10 including its orthogonality with respect to many transition metal catalyzed chemistries. In common practice, Cadogan transformations employ superstoichiometric amounts of phosphorus-based reagents at elevated temperatures (typically neat refluxing triethylphosphite), although milder conditions11 or alternative stoichiometric reagents12 have been applied in some cases. The process mass intensity and inherent inefficiencies of the stoichiometric Cadogan method have been persistent drawbacks that have limited its use on large synthetic scales.13

Catalytic variants of Cadogan-like reductive cyclizations of nitroarenes have been developed that in part address these challenges. For instance, numerous reports have described the use of palladium catalysis in conjunction with CO as a terminal reductant to achieve intramolecular heterocyclization of nitro substrates (Figure 1B).14 Despite the laboratory scale appeal of these synthetically useful methods, the difficulty of purging Lewis acidic metal catalysts from the nitrogen-rich products of cyclization and the use of pressurized carbon monoxide as a terminal reductant (which triggers the need for specialized reactors and safety protocols, especially in kilo lab and pilot plant settings) increase the operational complexity of synthetic routes in which these methods are employed. A notable exception in this latter regard is a recent report from Driver,15 who has developed an iron-hydride catalyzed synthesis of carbazoles and related derivatives in which the terminal reductant is a relatively innocuous liquid hydrosilane.

Our group has been pursuing a program aimed at developing designer main group compounds as biphilic16 organocatalysts in organic synthesis.17 In this vein, we recently reported that a simple trialkylphosphine catalyst containing a core four-membered ring, in combination with phenylsilane as a terminal reductant, provided a competent system for the catalytic reductive N–N bond forming heterocyclization of o-nitrobenzaldimines giving 2H-indazoles.18 In this chemistry, the phosphacyclic catalyst promotes reductive O-atom transfer from the nitroarene substrates by cycling in the PIII/PV=O catalytic couple. The varied catalytic chemistry of phosphine oxides is experiencing rapid expansion,19 and the potential of PIII/PV=O redox methods20 in particular to favorably impact the process intensity of otherwise stoichiometric phosphorus-mediated transformations has been specifically noted.21

Based on this precedent, we wished to ascertain whether the reactive intermediates generated from nitroarenes under PIII/PV=O catalytic conditions would be applicable to the construction of C–N bonds in an intramolecular Cadogan-like manner (Figure 1C). In this study, we report the discovery, development, and mechanistic evaluation of such a new biphilic organophosphorus-catalyzed method for carbazole and indole synthesis. The key features of the system we describe here include: (1) a practical, scalable, and operationally robust organophosphorus-catalyzed protocol for C–H functionalizing Cadogan azacyclizations that greatly simplifies product isolation for this class of reactions, (2) a combined experimental and computational assessment of the reaction mechanism for nitro deoxygenation and subsequent C–N bond formation that provides evidence for the controlling role of P-based biphilic reactivity in these catalytic Cadogan cyclizations, and (3) spectroscopic evidence for a heretofore unobserved adduct of a tricoordinate phosphorus compound and a nitrosoarene that we propose serves as the immediate precursor to C–H amination in the catalytic transformation. Taken together, these findings enrich fundamental understanding of the intermediate speciation in phosphine/nitroarene reactions and advance the biphilic reactivity of phosphetanes as generalized platforms for catalytic reductive O-atom transfer operating in the PIII/PV=O redox manifold.

2. Results

2.1 Optimization of Reaction Conditions

Consistent with observations made during the discovery of our previously reported catalytic N–N bond forming Cadogan indazolation, reaction of o-nitrobiphenyl 1 with a substoichiometric amount (15 mol%) of methyl phosphetane P-oxide 3•[O] and phenylsilane (2 equiv) produced carbazole product 2 with a GC yield of 84% after 16 h at 100 °C (Table 1, entry 1). Alteration of the exocyclic P-substituent was found to lower the catalytic reactivity; significantly lower yields were obtained under otherwise identical conditions for P-phenyl phosphetane 4•[O] (entry 2) and P-pyrrolidino phosphetane 5•[O] (entry 3). Control experiments demonstrate that the reaction does not occur when either the precatalyst 3•[O] (entry 4) or phenylsilane terminal reductant (entry 5) are omitted. Furthermore, the use of 15 mol% of PIII phosphetane 3 as catalyst in the presence of phenylsilane reductant produced a qualitatively similar amount of carbazole 2 (entry 6) as when 3•[O] is employed (entry 1), consistent with notion of catalysis involving cycling between PIII/PV=O species.

Table 1.

Phosphacycles as Catalysts for Deoxygenative Heterocyclization of o-Nitrobiphenyl 1.a

graphic file with name nihms939395u2.jpg

Entry R3P=O Silane Conversion (%) Yield (%)
1 3•[O] PhSiH3 99 84
2 4•[O] PhSiH3 30 23
3 5•[O] PhSiH3 18 7
4 none PhSiH3 14 0
5 3•[O] none 13 0
6 3 PhSiH3 94 86
7 6•[O] PhSiH3 81 20
8 7•[O] PhSiH3 4 0
9 8•[O] PhSiH3 14 12
10 9•[O] PhSiH3 35 20
11 10•[O] PhSiH3 1 0
12b 3•[O] PhSiH3 99 93
a

Conversion and yield determined via GC vs internal standard (dodecane).

b

Reaction conducted in n-butyl acetate (1.0 M) at 120 °C with 20 mol% 3•[O] for 12 h.

The four-membered phosphacycle of catalysts 3/3•[O] appears crucial for efficient carbazole formation. Five-membered ring containing phospholane-based precatalysts (6•[O] and 7•[O], entries 7, 8), which have previously been applied to catalytic PIII/PV=O Wittig20a,c,d,g–i and Appel20b reactions, gave low yield of carbazole 2. Moreover, acyclic phosphine oxides (8•[O], 9•[O], and 10•[O], entries 9–11) exhibited poor catalytic reactivity.

The catalytic reaction is tolerant of varied reaction solvents, and further optimization studies converged on conditions using 20 mol% of 3•[O] and 2 equiv of phenylsilane at 120 °C in n-butyl acetate, which gave excellent conversion to carbazole 2 (entry 12). A practical advantage of these conditions and the use of the low-volatility, process-scalable n-butyl acetate solvent22 is that carbazole product 2 precipitates from the homogeneous catalytic reaction mixture upon cooling and can be collected in >98% purity (HPLC) by filtration in a straightforward fashion.

2.2 Reaction Scope

2.2.1 Synthesis of carbazoles and related heterocycles

An investigation of the scope of the catalytic carbazole synthesis was undertaken, with results collected in Table 2. In view of the procedural simplicity of the catalytic protocol, we elected to conduct all of these examples on one-gram scale; the products reported in Table 2 were obtained in excellent purity by simple filtration and washing. In these experiments, no special precautions were employed to exclude air or moisture from the reaction; all reagents and solvents were commercial grade and charged to the reaction vessel under ambient atmosphere. In this manner, a variety of natural and unnatural carbazoles may be prepared in a useful manner. Methoxycarbazole natural products glycoborine (11) and clausine V (12) are representative examples, with isolated yields of 77% and 75%, respectively. We note that the 2,7-dialkoxycarbazole motif as in 12 has found applications in electrochromic and optoelectronic materials, and the current catalytic protocol compares favorably with the commonly employed stoichiometric Cadogan methods used for preparation of this fragment. Complementarily, 2,7-substituted carbazoles bearing electron-withdrawing groups were also produced in good yield, albeit in somewhat lower overall yield (compare 13 and 2).23 Variation of the biaryl core provides access to related heterocarbazole derivatives, as in the functionalized δ-carbolines 14–17. Both electron-withdrawing (14–16) and electron-donating substituents (17) are tolerated without incident. Fused polyheterocyclic compounds, including 7H-pyridocarbazole (18), are also capable of being prepared in good yield from the 5-aryl quinoline starting material.

Table 2.

Examples of Catalytic Carbazole Synthesis.a

graphic file with name nihms939395f12.jpg
a

Yields reported for isolated products.

b

(EtO)3SiH (4 equiv) was used as reductant. See Supporting Information for full experimental details.

2.2.2 Synthesis of indoles and related heterocycles

The catalytic protocol can be similarly applied to form indoles from various o-nitrostyrene compounds on a one-gram scale, although silica gel column chromatography proved to be more convenient for isolation of these examples (Table 3). It was found that 2-substituted aryl indoles can be easily accessed under standard reaction conditions, providing 2-phenyl (19, 21) and 2-mesityl (20) indole products with good yield. Nitrostyrene substrates bearing α-aliphatic, α,β-aliphatic, and α,β-aromatic moieties were found to similarly cyclize to give the corresponding 3-substituted (22) and 2,3-disubstituted (23, 24) indole products without incident. Additionally, 2-(2’-nitrophenyl)thiophene was cyclized to give 4H-thieno[3,2-b]indole (25) in good yield. A γ-pyrone bearing substrate was also readily cyclized to give pyrano[3,2-b]indole (26) in modest yield, which can be easily converted to the naturally occurring alkaloid koniamborine via N-methylation.24 Biindole (27) could be prepared following mono-cyclization of (E)-3-(2-nitrostyryl)-1H-indole using our catalytic reaction conditions.

Table 3.

Examples of Catalytic Indole Synthesis.a

graphic file with name nihms939395f13.jpg
a

Yields reported for isolated products.

b

Reaction was run on a half-gram scale. See Supporting Information for full experimental details.

2.3 Mechanistic Investigations

2.3.1 In situ spectral monitoring under catalytic conditions

In situ spectral monitoring of the catalytic reaction was performed in order to gain insight into the reaction mechanism and to canvass for catalytic intermediates. 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, 100 °C) of a catalytic reaction (1 equiv of 1, 20 mol% of 3•[O], 2 equiv of phenylsilane, 1 M in toluene-d8) showed consumption of 2-nitrobiphenyl 1 over ca. 4 h with concomitant appearance of carbazole 2 as the major product. 31P NMR spectra collected under identical conditions showed that phosphetane 3•[O] (δ 53.5 ppm) is rapidly consumed (t1/2~5 min), giving rise to two new resonances at δ 32.5 and δ 19.0 ppm in a 5:1 ratio (Figure 2). Independent synthesis confirms that these signals correspond to the diastereomers of tricoordinate phosphetane 3 (δ 32.5 (major, anti); δ 19.0 ppm (minor, syn)). In accord with extensive literature precedent,25 the lack of stereospecificity in the phosphetane P-oxide reduction event is taken to be indicative of the intermediacy of a pentacoordinate phosphorane with a sufficient lifetime during hydrosilane-mediated phosphine oxide reduction to permit pseudorotation leading to stereochemical scrambling.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Time-stacked in situ 31P NMR spectra during catalysis (T = 100 °C, toluene-d8). (A) t = 0 min; (B) t = 5 min; (C) t = 30 min; (D) t = 60 min. Chemical shifts (δ): anti-3•[O], 53.5 ppm; anti-3, 32.5 ppm; syn-3, 19.0 ppm.

As the catalytic conversion of 1 continues, the tricoordinate epimers of 3 remain the only observable phosphorus-containing compounds in solution. Evidently, tricoordinate 3 represents the catalytic resting state. When taken together, it can be inferred from the 1H and 31P NMR data that the turnover-limiting step in the catalytic formation of carbazole 2 involves an initial reaction of substrate 1 with tricoordinate phosphetane 3, and that phosphine oxide reduction of 3•[O] is more rapid than O-atom transfer to 3 from the 2-nitrobiphenyl substrate 1.

2.3.2 Catalytic reaction kinetics

The kinetic progress of standard catalytic reaction (eq 1; conditions: 1 equiv of 1, 20 mol% 3•[O], 2 equiv of phenylsilane, 1 M in n-butyl acetate, 118 ± 2 °C) was monitored quantitatively via ex situ HPLC analysis of reaction aliquots drawn at intervals over the course of 5 h.

graphic file with name nihms939395e1.jpg (1)

From the chromatograms (see Supporting Information), starting material 1 is converted to carbazole product 2 in >95 % efficiency. Plots depicting the depletion in concentration of starting material 1 as a function of time are fit by a model describing first order dependence in 1 (Figure 3A). The initial rates obtained via this method vary linearly with precatalyst 3•[O] concentration in the range 0.02 M ≤ [3•[O]] ≤ 0.08 M (Figure 3C), indicating that the reaction in eq 1 is pseudo-first order in precatalyst 3•[O]. Rate constants obtained by the complementary monitoring of increasing product 2 concentration with time at varying precatalyst 3•[O] concentrations (Figure 3B) agree within ±10%. Initial reaction rates measured for this same catalytic reaction do not vary as a function of phenylsilane concentration in the range 0.2 M–0.6 M (Figure 3D), and therefore the reaction rate is zeroth order in phenylsilane within this concentration regime. Taken together, the empirical rate law for the catalytic Cadogan cyclization o-nitrobiphenyl may be described as in eq 2:

ν=kexpt[1]1[3[O]]1[PhSiH3]0 (2)
Figure 3.

Figure 3

Kinetics experiments of catalytic reductive cyclization. (a) concentration of substrate 1 vs time; (b) concentration of product 2 vs time; (c) plot of initial rates of substrate 1 consumption vs concentration of precatalyst 3•[O]; (d) plot of observed initial rates of substrate 1 consumption vs phenylsilane concentration.

2.3.3 Hammett linear free energy relationship

In order to evaluate the electronic demand of the reaction, a panel of electronically varied 5-substituted 2-nitrobiphenyl compounds (1a–e) were treated under pseudo-first order conditions with an excess of phosphetane 3, and the rates of conversion to the corresponding carbazoles (2a–e) were monitored over time relative to an internal standard (1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene) via 1H NMR spectroscopy (eq 3).

graphic file with name nihms939395e2.jpg (3)

Qualitatively, a clear trend in relative rates for carbazole formation was observed, with substrates bearing electron-withdrawing 5-substituents proceeding to product more swiftly than those with electron-donating 5-substituents. A plot of log(kX/kH) versus substituent constant σp gives a good linear fit (Figure 4), from which a Hammett sensitivity constant ρ = +1.55 may be derived. Evidently, the rate-determining transition structure for the transformations 1a–e to 2a–e is one in which partial negative charge accrues to the nitroarene moiety as might be expected for a reaction that reduces the oxidation state of the nitrogen center. These data are consistent with linear free energy relationships obtained by Sundberg26 and Cadogan27 with triethylphosphite and related P(III) reagents.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Hammett plot for carbazole formation mediated by 3 according to the reaction depicted in eq 3. Equation: y = 1.552x − 0.046; R2 = 0.9978.

To compare this stoichiometric linear free energy relationship to one under catalytic conditions, the identical substrate set was transformed by reaction with 20 mol% 3•[O], 2 equiv of phenylsilane, at 100 °C in toluene-d8 (eq 4).

graphic file with name nihms939395e3.jpg (4)

As in the stoichiometric studies, a positive Hammett sensitivity constant identical within experimental error (ρ = +1.55) was obtained for the catalytic reaction (see Figure S1). This result adduces evidence that both the stoichiometric and catalytic reactions proceed in a mechanistically consistent manner in which the tricoordinate phosphetane 3 engages the nitroarene substrate in a rate-determining step involving net transferal of electron-density from the phosphorus compound to the nitro substrate.

2.3.4 Studies on nitrosobiaryl substrates

Despite the apparent absence of detectable intermediates during in situ spectroscopic monitoring, it seemed reasonable to consider the potential intermediacy of 2-nitrosobiphenyl (28). Previous studies on reductive nitroarene transformations have considered nitrosoarenes to be obligate intermediates, and Cadogan has specifically shown the stoichiometric conversion of 2-nitrosobiphenyl to carbazole with P(OEt)3.28 A control experiment in which 2-nitrosobiphenyl (28) was subjected to catalytic conditions (eq 5) was found to produce 67% of carbazole 2 in addition to 11% of 2-aminobiphenyl (29). This result suggests that 2-nitrosobiphenyl is indeed a viable intermediate en route to carbazole under catalytic conditions, although alternative pathways compete at the relatively high concentrations of 28 in eq 5. The origin of the reduced product 29 remains a topic of investigation.

graphic file with name nihms939395e4.jpg (5)

In an attempt to further investigate the reaction of 2-nitrosobiphenyl (28) with phosphetane 3, low temperature VT-NMR studies were conducted. In a representative experiment (eq 6), a toluene-d8 solution of 3 (0.13 M) was frozen in liquid nitrogen, and a cold (−78 °C) solution of 2-nitrosobiphenyl (28, 0.11 M, 1.3 equiv) was layered on top via syringe injection.

graphic file with name nihms939395e5.jpg (6)

The resulting heterogeneous mixture was inserted into a −60 °C thermostatted NMR probe, where it underwent thawing and slow diffusional mixing over the course of ca. 80 min. 31P NMR spectra (Figure 5) recorded subsequently at 10 min intervals showed the initial consumption of the starting tricoordinate phosphetane 3 (δ 24.2 major, 11.3 minor ppm)29 and conversion to two new resonances with an upfield chemical shift (δ −24.4 major, −21.8 minor ppm). At subsequent time points, the resonances from these intermediates diminished, concomitant with growth of signals corresponding to 3•[O] (δ 54.1 major, 61.8 minor ppm). Upon termination of the NMR experiment, an aliquot of the mixture was submitted to GCMS analysis, which showed the presence of phosphetane P-oxide 3•[O] and carbazole 2 as the only observable products.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Time-stacked in situ 31P NMR spectra of the reaction of phosphetane 3 and 2-nitrosobiphenyl 28 (−60 °C < T < −50 °C, toluene-d8). (A) t = 0 min; (B) t = 120 min; (C) t = 200 min; (D) t = 300 min; (E) t = 390 min. Chemical shifts (δ): anti-3•[O], 54.1 ppm; syn-3•[O], 61.8 ppm; anti-3, 24.2 ppm; syn-3, 11.3 ppm; syn-30, −21.8 ppm; anti-30, −24.4 ppm.

On the basis of the foregoing experiment, we postulate that the observed 31P NMR resonance at δ −24.4 ppm corresponds to a metastable intermediate along the C–N bond forming carbazolation pathway, arising from reaction of phosphetane 3 and 2-nitrosobiphenyl (28). Furthermore, reaction between phosphetane 3 and isotopically labelled 2-(15N)nitrosobiphenyl shows that the resonance at δ −24.4 ppm exhibits 31P–15N scalar coupling with J = 40.8 Hz (Figure 6A). The magnitude of this coupling constant falls within the expected range for direct one-bond 1JPN coupling,30 and the upfield 31P chemical shift is most consistent with a formulation as a pentacoordinate phosphorane species.17b,31 A complementary doublet centered at δ 239 ppm (J = 40.6 Hz) is observed in the 15N NMR spectrum. We therefore posit that PV oxazaphosphirane structures 30, as depicted in eq 6, give rise to the observed intermediate 31P NMR resonances. Compounds 30 would be formed from 3 as two magnetically inequivalent stereoisomers (anti-30 and syn-30) that could account for the observed signals in the heteronuclear NMR spectra.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Heteronuclear NMR spectra of a reaction of phosphetane 3 and 2-(15N)nitrosobiphenyl 28 (−60 °C < T < −50 °C, toluene-d8). Units are ppm relative to 85% H3PO4 (31P, δ = 0.0 ppm) and liquid NH3 (15N, δ = 0.0 ppm). (A) Annotated 31P NMR spectrum. (B) Annotated 15N NMR spectrum. (C) DFT model of oxazaphosphiranes 30Grel = −0.3 kcal/mol favoring anti-30).

The geometries of DFT models for diastereomers anti-30 and syn-30 were optimized at the M06-2X/6–311++G(d,p) level of theory (Figure 6C), and the magnetic shielding tensors for these species were computed by the gauge-independent atomic orbital (GIAO) routine at the PBE1PBE/6–311G(2d,2p) level. The predicted isotropic chemical shifts for anti-30 and syn-30 (δ −26.8 and −28.8 ppm, respectively) are in good agreement with the observed signals in the low temperature 31P NMR spectra depicted in Figure 6. As a further measure of confidence in the predicted NMR shift for 30, we similarly computed GIAO 31P NMR chemical shifts for the epimers of 3 and 3•[O], whose structures and spectra are independently known from experiment (Table 4). The linear correlation between observed and calculated 31P NMR chemical shifts (Figure S7) provides an internal validation that the GIAO routine renders a quality description (average error of δ ±5 ppm) of the isotropic chemical shift in this series of experimentally relevant phosphetane compounds. The general suitability of GIAO-DFT methods for the prediction of 31P NMR chemical shifts has recently been analyzed by Latypov and coworkers.32

Table 4.

Experimentala and calculatedb 31P NMR chemical shift valuesc for 3, 3•[O], and 30.

Compound Chemical shift (δ)c

expta calcb
syn-3 +11.3 +14.3
anti-3 +24.2 +24.2
syn-3•[O] +61.8 +52.0
anti-3•[O] +54.1 +54.0
syn-30 −21.8 −28.8
anti-30 −24.4 −26.8
a

Isotropic 31P NMR (161.796 MHz) chemical shift in toluene-d8 at T = −60 °C.

b

GIAO NMR chemical shift at the PBE1PBE/6–311G(2d,2p)//M06-2X/6–311++G(d,p) level of theory.

c

Chemical shift (δ) in ppm referenced relative to 85% H3PO4 standard (δ = 0.0 ppm).

2.4 Computational Modeling of the Reaction Sequence

2.4.1 DFT studies of the first deoxygenation event – mechanism of nitroarene deoxygenation

In an effort to gain a more atomistic understanding of the mechanism of catalytic Cadogan cyclization, potential energy surface modeling of the two sequential deoxygenations of 2-nitrobiphenyl (1) by phosphetane 3 were conducted at the M06-2X/6–311++G(d,p) level of theory with a polarizable continuum model (PCM) for solvation in n-butyl acetate (ε = 4.9941). In accord with our previous calculations on a related system,18 computational models indicate a stepwise pathway for the initial deoxygenation of 1 by phosphetane 3 proceeding by (3+1) cheletropic addition (TS1, ΔGrel = +30.0 kcal/mol) to form pentacoordinate spiro-bicyclic dioxazaphosphetane species INT1 (Figures 7 and 8). Both the P–O (2.39 Å and 2.21 Å) and N–O (1.28 Å and 1.27 Å) bond distances in TS1 are indicative of a concerted mechanism in which the phosphorous concurrently attacks the two oxygen atoms of the nitro group. The heteroatomic ring system of INT1 displays a nearly planar four-membered ring (DPONO = 6.7°) that includes a square pyramidal phosphorus and a pyramidal nitrogen.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

DFT mechanism (M06-2X/6–311++G(d,p)/PCM) for deoxygenation of 2-nitrobiphenyl 1 by phosphetane 3. Relative free energies (kcal/mol) in italics. Phosphorus (orange), oxygen (red), nitrogen (blue), carbon (gray), hydrogen (white).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

DFT transition structures (M06-2X/6–311++G(d,p)/PCM) along the stepwise deoxygenation pathway with selected bond metrics. Phosphorus (orange), oxygen (red), nitrogen (blue), carbon (gray), hydrogen (white).

Subsequent evolution of dioxazaphosphetane INT1 produces phosphine oxide 3•[O] and 2-nitrosobiphenyl (28) by a retro-(2+2) fragmentation. This step is computed to be significant downhill energetically (ΔGrel = −35.8 kcal/mol), with comparatively low kinetic barrier via TS2Grel = +11.8 kcal/mol). The low activation energy of the cycloreversion is consistent with ring strain relief and the advanced formation of phosphetane P-oxide 3•[O].

The calculated (3+1) pathway is adequate to account for the observed linear free energy correlation (see Sect. 2.3.3). DFT energy barriers computed for the (3+1) cheletropic addition of 5-substituted 2-nitrobiphenyls with 3 (Table 5) reproduce with good quantitative agreement the trend observed experimentally in Figure 4; namely, that electron-withdrawing substituents accelerate the rate of formal (3+1) cheletropic addition.

Table 5.

Experimental and computational linear free energy relationship correlation.

−X σpara kX/kH ΔΔGc

expta expta calcb
−NMe2 −0.83 0.04 +1.9 +2.8
−OMe −0.27 0.37 +0.6 +0.5
−H 0 1.00 0.0 0.0
−Cl 0.23 2.01 −0.4 −1.9
−CF3 0.54 5.67 −1.0 −2.9
a

See Supporting Information for full details.

b

Relative transition state free energy calculated by M06-2X/6–311++G(d,p).

c

Units are kcal/mol at T=298 K.

2.4.2 DFT studies of the second deoxygenation event – mechanism of nitrosoarene deoxygenation and C–N bond formation

Modeling the deoxygenation of 2-nitrosobiphenyl 28 by phosphetane 3 revealed the favorable formation of oxazaphosphirane intermediates 30Grel = −3.7 kcal/mol for the most stable anti-30 diastereomer, shown in Figure 9). The transition structure found for the (2+1) addition, TS3Grel = +24.8 kcal/mol), is largely asynchronous and displays a bonding interaction between the lone pair of the phosphorus and the π*(N=O) orbital of the nitrosoarene (Figure 10, P–O = 2.01 Å).33

Figure 9.

Figure 9

DFT mechanism (M06-2X/6–311++G(d,p)/PCM) for deoxygenation of 2-nitrosobiphenyl 28 by phosphetane 3. Relative free energies (kcal/mol) shown in italics. Phosphorus (orange), oxygen (red), nitrogen (blue), carbon (gray), hydrogen (white).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

DFT transition structures (M06-2X/6–311++G(d,p)/PCM) along the stepwise deoxygenation pathway with selected bond metrics. Phosphorus (orange), oxygen (red), nitrogen (blue), carbon (gray), hydrogen (white).

Efforts to locate transition structures associated with the collapse of oxazaphosphirane anti-30 led to TS4a and TS4b, which describe two extremes in the bond forming sequence toward the generation of carbazole (2) (Figure 10). Whereas TS4a represents the dissociative pathway in which phosphetane P-oxide 3•[O] departs before the C–N bond is formed to generate biphenylnitrene 31, TS4b corresponds to the associative pathway where C–N bond formation is fairly advanced before the departure of 3•[O]. Estimation of the activation energies of TS4a and TS4b using the Yamaguchi spin projection method to account for spin contamination suggests that the dissociative pathway denoted by TS4aGrel = +11.9 kcal/mol) is strongly favored compared to the associative pathway via TS4bGrel = +43.1 kcal/mol). The incipient formation of the C–N bond in TS4b affords a highly ordered transition structure that, relative to intermediate anti-30, displays significant elongation of the P–N bond distance.34 Taking into account that the combined dissociation products (singlet biphenylnitrene 31 and 3•[O]) are computed to be ΔGrel = +2.2 kcal/mol above the reactants and that the calculated activation energy reported for its cyclization via TS5 is ΔGrel = +6.9 kcal/mol,35,36 the computations are consistent with the experimental detection of intermediates 30 and the non-limiting barrier measured for their collapse to afford carbazole (2).

3. discussion

The synthetic method described above represents a robust and process scalable organocatalytic approach to the synthesis of carbazoles and indoles from appropriately decorated nitroarene substrates. In view of the operational simplicity and comparatively mild conditions of the catalytic reaction protocol, it might be expected that this approach could supplant traditional stoichiometric Cadogan cyclization in circumstances where it is currently employed.

With respect to the function of the phosphorus-based catalyst, the results of both synthetic and spectral investigations are consistent with the requirement for interconversion of 3 and 3•[O] during the course of the catalysis via PIII/PV=O redox cycling. It has long been held that the central impediment to catalysis in the PIII/PV=O couple stems from the kinetic and thermodynamic inertness of phosphine oxide P=O bond. Despite these notions, we find in the case of this catalytic Cadogan system that in situ reduction of the phosphine oxide is not turnover limiting. Instead, the small ring phosphacycle in 3•[O] exhibits a high rate of P=O deoxygenation by hydrosilane reductant to the tricoordinate phosphetane 3, which represents the resting state of the catalytic cycle. The rapid rate with which 3•[O] is deoxygenated falls in line with precedent regarding the swift deoxygenation of cyclic phosphine oxides,20b,20d,37 and builds on fundamental notions of enhanced electrophilic reactivity of constrained phosphacycles.38

The phosphorus-based catalyst operates on the nitro substrate to effect double deoxygenation in a stepwise fashion. The first deoxygenation step is gated kinetically by a pericyclic (3+1) cheletropic addition, which can be understood with the nitro substrate expressing orbital character as a 4πs component39 and the phosphetane as a 2ωs component.17b,18 Both the experimental and computed Hammett correlations are in good agreement, providing an affirmative benchmark for this DFT pathway. The proposed (3+1)-pathway has not typically been invoked in Cadogan chemistry (where proposals of acyclic zwitterionic intermediates have prevailed9,13b); the data presented here provide evidence, albeit indirect, for the intervention of such an ephemeral four-membered ring intermediate in phosphine/nitroarene reactions. The second deoxygenation step again involves an all-heteroatom cyclic intermediate, but spectroscopic identification is permitted in this case. Heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy, bolstered by GIAO-DFT modeling, provide evidence for the formation of an oxazaphosphirane upon low temperature mixing of phosphetane 3 and 2-nitrosobiphenyl. Both Cadogan40 and Sundberg26 have speculated on the involvement of an oxazaphosphirane species in the reaction pathway leading to product, but such a species has not been directly observed. We believe that our spectra represent the first characterization of the unusual all-heteroatom (ONP) small-ring system. It seems likely that thermal decomposition of this oxazaphosphirane intermediate above ca. −50 °C leads to dissociation of phosphetane 3•[O] with conversion of biarylnitrene residue to carbazole. Via this pathway, the system here converges with the extensive body of experimental and theoretical literature concerning the electronic configuration and ring-closing reactivity of 2-biphenylnitrene.35

The sequence of elementary steps proposed for nitroarene double deoxygenation is usefully contextualized by isolobal analogy to the reactions of tricoordinate phosphorus compounds with ozone and singlet oxygen (Figure 11). It is well-known that phosphines and phosphites undergo formal (3+1) addition of O3 to form cyclic ozonides (R3P•O3) with pentacoordinated phosphorus centers contained within a four-membered trioxaphosphetane (i.e. O3P) ring system,41 which in view of the significant thermodynamic driving force for adduct formation occur with near diffusion-controlled rates. Subsequent thermal decomposition of the phosphine(-ite) ozonides I eliminates one equivalent of phosphine oxide and gives 1O2.41,42 In the case of the proposed (3+1) addition of nitroarenes to phosphines, the thermodynamic driving force for cheletropic addition is greatly diminished as compared to the O3 analogue; the kinetic barrier to adduct formation is consequently increased to the extent that it becomes kinetically limiting to catalysis. The azadioxophosphetane adducts III are therefore not observable and instead proceed to fragment in retro-(2+2) fashion with elimination of an equivalent of phosphine oxide and formation of a nitrosoarene byproduct.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Isolobal correspondence between (A) O3 and (B) RNO2 in their sequence of reactions with tricoordinate phosphorus compounds.

Continuing the isolobal analogy, singlet oxygen has been shown to react with tricoordinate phosphorus to give adducts that have been spectroscopically characterized by Selke at low temperature as pentacoordinate dioxaphosphiranes (R3P•O2, II).43 These R3PO2 compounds behave as electrophilic oxene donors with loss of R3PO, in much the same way that the pro-posed oxazaphosphirane IV (viz. 30) exhibits nitrene-like ability to aminate proximal Csp2-H bonds. The extent to which the deoxygenation of nitro compounds by small-ring phosphacycles via the proposed oxazaphosphirane serves as a general organophosphorus-catalyzed entry into nitrene- or nitrenoid-reactivity is a matter of ongoing study.

4. Conclusion

We have demonstrated a catalytic Cadogan synthesis of useful carbazole and indole products with a small-ring phosphacycle catalyst and hydrosilane terminal reductant. Experimental and computational modeling results implicate the operation of a PIII/PV=O redox cycle in which phosphine 3 is the resting state and initial deoxygenation of the nitro substrate represents the turnover-limiting step. 31P NMR spectral monitoring and modeling of the second deoxygenation event imply the intervention of a spirocyclic pentacoordinate phosphorus intermediate exhibiting an unprecedented oxazaphosphirane ring system, the decomposition of which leads to carbazole product with loss of phosphetane P-oxide through a nitrenoid pathway. Additional studies on the structure and reactivity of pentacoordinate oxazaphosphirane species of this type are warranted. Finally, the mechanistic hypotheses advanced in this study provide a framework for future biphilic organophosphorus catalyst design and for reaction development within this PIII/PV=O manifold, both of which constitute active ongoing research aims in our laboratories.

5. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

A full description of the general experimental methods can be found in the Supporting Information.

5.1 Representative Synthetic Procedure for Carbazoles

To a 40 mL screw-cap vial fitted with a stir bar was added 1 gram of o-nitrobiphenyl substrate, 20 mol% of phosphetane oxide precatalyst 3•[O], n-butyl acetate (1 M), and phenylsilane (2 equiv). A cap was screwed on and the reaction was heated at 120 °C with stirring until TLC indicated the completion of reaction. Following cyclization, the homogeneous reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, during which time a precipitate was formed. The solids were collected on a glass frit and washed with one portion of CH2Cl2 to yield the carbazole products with >98% purity by HPLC analysis.

5.2 Representative Synthetic Procedure for Indoles

To a flame-dried 25 mL round-bottom flask fitted with a stir bar was added 1 gram of o-nitrostyrene substrate, 20 mol% of phosphetane oxide precatalyst 3•[O], and a septum. Following evacuation and the introduction of nitrogen on a Schlenk line, dry n-butyl acetate (1 M) was added via syringe from a SureSeal bottle. Phenylsilane (2 equiv) was added lastly and heating/stirring (120 °C, ~500 rpm) was continued under positive nitrogen until TLC indicated the completion of the reaction. Following completion, the sample was allowed to cool and 10 mL of 3–6 M HCl was added. The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (2×25 mL). The combined organic layer was then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated in vacuo. Column chromatography on silica subsequently afforded the desired indole products.

5.3 Kinetics Experiments

For a kinetic run corresponding to a single rate constant, a solution of 2-nitrobiphenyl (1) and phosphetane P-oxide 3•[O] in n-butyl acetate was prepared under nitrogen in an oven-dried, three-neck round-bottom flask fitted with a silicon-tipped IR probe and a magnetic stir bar. The solution temperature was stabilized at 108 ± 2 °C and the reaction was initiated by adding phenylsilane. Reaction monitoring started 15 min after the addition of phenylsilane to ensure full reduction of 3•[O] as determined by disappearance of the P-oxide IR absorbance at 1195 cm−1. Sample aliquots (20 µL ± 10%) were periodically taken using a calibrated automated sampler,44 diluted at room temperature into n-butyl acetate (80×) and analyzed using an HPLC system equipped with a C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm) and a SPD-20A/20AV UV–vis detector. Good pseudo-first-order plots were obtained by monitoring the growth of carbazole (2) relative to a standard calibration curve and the initial rates (Δ[1]/Δt) were calculated by multiplying the pseudo-first-order reaction rate constants (exponential slopes) by the corresponding concentrations of 2-nitrobiphenyl (1). Rates were shown to be reproducible within experimental error (± 10%).

5.4 Computational Methods

Geometries were optimized in Gaussian 0945 using the M06-2X46 density functional with the 6–311++G(d,p) basis set. The calculated energies (ΔG, 298.15 K, 1.0 atm) result from the sum of electronic and thermal free energies as obtained from the frequency analysis at the same level of theory. Frequency calculations for all stationary points were carried out to describe them either as minima (i = 0) or as first-order transition states (i = 1). For all transition structures, visualization of the imaginary frequencies corresponded to the expected normal mode for the elementary step under investigation. Intrinsic reaction coordinate calculations (IRC) were performed from the transition states in forward and reverse directions to confirm the lowest energy reaction pathways that connect the corresponding minima. See Supporting Information for further details.

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgments

Financial support was provided by NIH NIGMS (GM114547), MIT, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. We thank the Buchwald laboratory (MIT) for access to equipment and chemicals.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

Synthetic procedures; 1H, 13C, 15N and 31P NMR spectra; kinetics data; computational details and Cartesian coordinates

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  • 1.(a) Schmidt AW, Reddy KR, Knölker H-J. Chem. Rev. 2012;112:3193. doi: 10.1021/cr200447s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kaushik NK, Kaushik N, Attri P, Kumar N, Kim CH, Verma AK, Choi EH. Molecules. 2013;18:6620. doi: 10.3390/molecules18066620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Justin Thomas KR, Lin JT, Tao Y-T, Ko C-W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:9404. doi: 10.1021/ja010819s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Blouin N, Michaud A, Gendron D, Wakim S, Blair E, Neagu-Plesu R, Belletête M, Durocher G, Tao Y, Leclerc M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:732. doi: 10.1021/ja0771989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Gendron D, Leclerc M. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011;4:1225. [Google Scholar]; (d) Sathiyan G, Sivakumar EKT, Ganesamoorthy R, Thangamuthu R, Sakthivel P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016;57:243. [Google Scholar]; (e) Rajamalli P, Senthilkumar N, Huang P-Y, Ren-Wu C-C, Lin H-W, Cheng C-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:10948. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b03848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Roy J, Jana AK, Mal D. Tetrahedron. 2012;68:6099. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Taber DF, Tirunahari PK. Tetrahedron. 2011;67:7195. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2011.06.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Humphrey GR, Kuethe JT. Chem. Rev. 2006;106:2875. doi: 10.1021/cr0505270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Tsang WCP, Zheng N, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:14560. doi: 10.1021/ja055353i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Jordan-Hore JA, Johansson CCC, Gulias M, Beck EM, Gaunt MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:16184. doi: 10.1021/ja806543s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Tsang WCP, Munday RH, Brasche G, Zheng N, Buchwald SL. J. Org. Chem. 2008;73:7603. doi: 10.1021/jo801273q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Cho SH, Yoon J, Chang S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:5996. doi: 10.1021/ja111652v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Takamatsu K, Hirano K, Satoh T, Miura M. Org. Lett. 2014;16:2892. doi: 10.1021/ol501037j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Suzuki C, Hirano K, Satoh T, Miura M. Org. Lett. 2015;17:1597. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Smith PAS, Brown BB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951;73:2435. [Google Scholar]; (b) Sundberg RJ, Lin L-S, Blackburn DE. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1969;6:441. [Google Scholar]; (c) Sundberg RJ, Russell HF, Ligon WV, Lin L-S. J. Org. Chem. 1972;37:719. [Google Scholar]; (d) Lindley JM, McRobbie IM, Meth-Cohn O, Suschitzky H. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1. 1977;0:2194. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Shen M, Leslie BE, Driver TG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:5056. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Stokes BJ, Jovanović B, Dong H, Richert KJ, Riell RD, Driver TG. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74:3225. doi: 10.1021/jo9002536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sun K, Liu S, Bec PM, Driver TG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:1702. doi: 10.1002/anie.201006917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Pumphrey AL, Dong H, Driver TG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:5920. doi: 10.1002/anie.201201788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Archibald T. Managing Hazardous Reactions and Compounds in Process Chemistry; ACS Symposium Series. Vol. 1181. American Chemical Society; Washington, DC: 2014. pp. 87–109. [Google Scholar]; (b) González-Bobes F, Kopp N, Li L, Deerberg J, Sharma P, Leung S, Davies M, Bush J, Hamm J, Hrytsak M. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012;16:2051. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Cadogan JIG, Cameron-Wood M, Mackie RK, Searle RJG. J. Chem. Soc. 1965:4831. [Google Scholar]; (b) Cadogan JIG. Q. Rev. Chem. Soc. 1968;22:222. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Ono N. The Nitro Group in Organic Synthesis. Wiley; New York, NY: 2001. [Google Scholar]; (b) Gui J, Pan C-M, Jin Y, Qin T, Lo JC, Lee BJ, Spergel SH, Mertzman ME, Pitts WJ, Cruz TEL, Schmidt MA, Darvatkar N, Natarajan SR, Baran PS. Science. 2015;348:886. doi: 10.1126/science.aab0245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bartoli G, Dalpozzo R, Nardi M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:4728. doi: 10.1039/c4cs00045e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Genung NE, Wei L, Aspnes GE. Org. Lett. 2014;16:3114. doi: 10.1021/ol5012423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.(a) Dohle W, Staubitz A, Knochel P. Chem. Eur. J. 2003;9:5323. doi: 10.1002/chem.200305090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wróbel Z, Wojciechowski K. Synlett. 2011;2011:2567. [Google Scholar]; (c) Gao H, Xu Q-L, Yousufuddin M, Ess DH, Kürti L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:2701. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Tong S, Xu Z, Mamboury M, Wang Q, Zhu J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:11809. doi: 10.1002/anie.201505713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Yang K, Zhou F, Kuang Z, Gao G, Driver TG, Song Q. Org. Lett. 2016;18:4088. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Appukkuttan P, Eycken EVder, Dehaen W. Synlett. 2005;2005:127. [Google Scholar]; (b) Freeman AW, Urvoy M, Criswell ME. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:5014. doi: 10.1021/jo0503299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Creencia EC, Kosaka M, Muramatsu T, Kobayashi M, Iizuka T, Horaguchi T. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 2009;46:1309. [Google Scholar]; (d) Peng H, Chen X, Chen Y, He Q, Xie Y, Yang C. Tetrahedron. 2011;67:5725. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.(a) Akazome M, Kondo T, Watanabe Y. J. Org. Chem. 1994;59:3375. [Google Scholar]; (b) Söderberg BC, Shriver JA. J. Org. Chem. 1997;62:5838. [Google Scholar]; (c) Smitrovich JH, Davies IW. Org. Lett. 2004;6:533. doi: 10.1021/ol036294l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Davies IW, Smitrovich JH, Sidler R, Qu C, Gresham V, Bazaral C. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:6425. [Google Scholar]; (e) Hsieh THH, Dong VM. Tetrahedron. 2009;65:3062. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shevlin M, Guan X, Driver TG. ACS Catal. 2017;7:5518. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kirby AJ, Warren SG. The Organic Chemistry of Phosphorus. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1967. p. 20. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.(a) Dunn NL, Ha M, Radosevich AT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:11330. doi: 10.1021/ja302963p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Reichl KD, Dunn NL, Fastuca NJ, Radosevich AT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:5292. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b01899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhao W, Yan PK, Radosevich AT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:616. doi: 10.1021/ja511889y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nykaza TV, Harrison TS, Ghosh A, Putnik RA, Radosevich AT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:6839. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b03260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.(a) Marsden SP, McGonagle AE, McKeever-Abbas B. Org. Lett. 2008;10:2589. doi: 10.1021/ol800921n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Denton RM, An J, Adeniran B. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:3025. doi: 10.1039/c002825h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Denton RM, Tang X, Przeslak A. Org. Lett. 2010;12:4678. doi: 10.1021/ol102010h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Denton RM, An J, Adeniran B, Blake AJ, Lewis W, Poulton AM. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:6749. doi: 10.1021/jo201085r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Denton RM, An J, Lindovska P, Lewis W. Tetrahedron. 2012;68:2899. [Google Scholar]; (f) An J, Tang X, Moore J, Lewis W, Denton RM. Tetrahedron. 2013;69:8769. [Google Scholar]; (g) Marsden SP. In: Sustainable Catalysis. Dunn PJ, Hii KK(Mimi), Krische MJ, Williams MT, editors. John Wiley & Sons Inc.; Hoboken, NJ: 2013. pp. 339–361. [Google Scholar]; (h) Yu T-Y, Wang Y, Xu P-F. Chem. Eur. J. 2014;20:98. doi: 10.1002/chem.201303688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Wang L, Qin R-Q, Yan H-Y, Ding M-W. Synthesis. 2015;47:3522. [Google Scholar]; (j) Yan Y-M, Rao Y, Ding M-W. J. Org. Chem. 2016;81:1263. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b02575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.(a) O’Brien CJ, Tellez JL, Nixon ZS, Kang LJ, Carter AL, Kunkel SR, Przeworski KC, Chass GA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:6836. doi: 10.1002/anie.200902525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) van Kalkeren HA, Leenders SHAM, Hommersom CRA, Rutjes FPJT, van Delft FL. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:11290. doi: 10.1002/chem.201101563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) O’Brien CJ, Lavigne F, Coyle EE, Holohan AJ, Doonan BJ. Chem. Eur. J. 2013;19:5854. doi: 10.1002/chem.201300546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) O’Brien CJ, Nixon ZS, Holohan AJ, Kunkel SR, Tellez JL, Doonan BJ, Coyle EE, Lavigne F, Kang LJ, Przeworski KC. Chem. Eur. J. 2013;19:15281. doi: 10.1002/chem.201301444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) van Kalkeren HA, te Grotenhuis C, Haasjes FS, Hommersom C(Rianne)A, Rutjes FPJT, van Delft FL. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013;2013:7059. [Google Scholar]; (f) Tsai Y-L, Lin W. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2015;4:1040. [Google Scholar]; (g) Lee C-J, Chang T-H, Yu J-K, Madhusudhan Reddy G, Hsiao M-Y, Lin W. Org. Lett. 2016;18:3758. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Saleh N, Voituriez A. J. Org. Chem. 2016;81:4371. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b00473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Schirmer M-L, Adomeit S, Spannenberg A, Werner T. Chem. Eur. J. 2016;22:2458. doi: 10.1002/chem.201503744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Voituriez A, Saleh N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016;57:4443. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.van Kalkeren HA, Blom AL, Rutjes FPJT, Huijbregts MAJ. Green Chem. 2013;15:1255. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Henderson RK, Jiménez-González C, Constable DJC, Alston SR, Inglis GGA, Fisher G, Sherwood J, Binks SP, Curzons AD. Green Chem. 2011;13:854. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.The lower observed yields with some substrates bearing electron-withdrawing substituents correlate with an increase in undesired noncyclative reduction of the nitro group to the corresponding aniline. The identity of the hydrosilane reductant has some role in mitigating this pathway (cf. 13), although the origin of this minor competing reduction remains under investigation.
  • 24.(a) Grougnet R, Magiatis P, Fokialakis N, Mitaku S, Skaltsounis A-L, Tillequin F, Sévenet T, Litaudon M. J. Nat. Prod. 2005;68:1083. doi: 10.1021/np050013w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Clawson RW, Söderberg BCG. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:6019. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.(a) Mislow K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1970;3:321. [Google Scholar]; (b) Marinetti A, Carmichael D. Chem. Rev. 2002;102:201. doi: 10.1021/cr990135r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sundberg RJ, Lang C-C. J. Org. Chem. 1971;36:300. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Armour MA, Cadogan JIG, Grace DSB. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans 2. 1975;11:1185. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bunyan PJ, Cadogan JIG. J. Chem. Soc. 1963;0:42. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.The 31P NMR chemical shifts of 3 and 3•[O] exhibit temperature dependent behavior. See Supporting Information for plots of 31P NMR chemical shift temperature dependence for syn-3 and anti-3. The temperature dependence of 31P NMR chemical shifts has been noted previously, see: Gordon MD, Quin LD. J. Magn. Reson. 1976;22:149.
  • 30.(a) Gombler W, Kinas RW, Stec WJ. Z. Naturforsch. B. 1983;38:815. [Google Scholar]; (b) Viljanen T, Klika KD, Fülöp F, Pihlaja K. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2. 1998;0:1479. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kojima S, Sugino M, Matsukawa S, Nakamoto M, Akiba K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:7674. doi: 10.1021/ja0170145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Latypov SK, Polyancev FM, Yakhvarov DG, Sinyahsin OG. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17:6976. doi: 10.1039/c5cp00240k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Khursan VS, Shamukaev VA, Chainikova EM, Khursan SL, Safiullin RL. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2013;62:2477. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.TS4b displays an N–O–P connectivity considered for the mechanism of oxygen transfer from nitrones to phosphines: Kurtzweil ML, Beak P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:3426.
  • 35.For related DFT calculations of nitrene insertions, see: Tsao M-L, Gritsan N, James TR, Platz MS, Hrovat DA, Borden WT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:9343. doi: 10.1021/ja0351591. and references therein.
  • 36.Calculation of the transition structure for the direct cyclization of 2-nitrosobiphenyl (TS6 in Supporting Information) affords a high activation barrier, ΔGrel = +32.2 kcal/mol, inconsistent with the mechanistic studies presented herein and indicative of a large preference for the nitrenoid pathway shown in Figure 10. For a discussion on the cyclization of nitrosoarenes, see: Davies IW, Guner VA, Houk KN. Org. Lett. 2004;5:743. doi: 10.1021/ol0364273.
  • 37.(a) Marsi KL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969;91:4724. [Google Scholar]; (b) Marsi KL. J. Org. Chem. 1974;39:265. [Google Scholar]; (c) Keglevich G, Fekete M, Chuluunbaatar T, Dobó A, Harmat V, Tőke L. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2000;1:4451. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.(a) Westheimer FH. Acc. Chem. Res. 1968;1:70. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hudson RF, Brown C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1972;5:204. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.(a) Leitich J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1976;15:372–373. [Google Scholar]; (b) Balczewski P, Beddoes R, Joule JA. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1991:559. [Google Scholar]; (c) Rudchenko VF. Chem. Rev. 1993;93:725. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cadogan JIG, Todd MJ. J. Chem. Soc. C. 1969;0:2808. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Murray RW. In: Singlet Oxygen. Wasserman HH, Murray RW, editors. Academic Press; New York: 1979. pp. 93–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Related retro-(2+2) fragmentations of this type are of course well-known in phosphorus ylide olefination pathways.
  • 43.Ho DG, Gao R, Celaje J, Chung H-Y, Selke M. Science. 2003;302:259. doi: 10.1126/science.1089145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Accurate reaction sampling and dilution was performed using a probe-based Mettler-Toledo EasySampler 1210 system, see: Kerstin Z, Grosser S, Welch CJ. Tetrahedron. 2017;73:5048.
  • 45.Frisch MJ, et al. Gaussian 09, revision B.01. Gaussian, Inc.; Wallingford, CT: 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.(a) Zhao Y, Truhlar DG. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008;120:215. [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhao Y, Truhlar DG. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008;41:157. doi: 10.1021/ar700111a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES