Table 4.
Expert panel | English-speaking country professionals | English-speaking country consumer advocates | Sri Lanka professionals | Japan professionals | India professionals | Philippines professionals | Refugee and immigrant professionals | Refugee and immigrant advocates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
English-speaking country professionals | 1.00 | .92 | .79 | .71 | .66 | .68 | .91 | .84 |
English-speaking country consumers | .92 | 1.00 | .76 | .70 | .64 | .65 | .88 | .84 |
Sri Lanka professionals | .76 | .69 | 1.00 | .69 | .75 | .67 | .82 | .80 |
Japan professionals | .68 | .67 | .69 | 1.00 | .80 | .78 | .72 | .66 |
India professionals | .65 | .60 | .76 | .78 | 1.00 | .87 | .70 | .65 |
Philippines professionals | .69 | .63 | .68 | .74 | .87 | 1.00 | .70 | .65 |
Refugee and immigrant professionals | .91 | .88 | .87 | .71 | .71 | .70 | 1.00 | .91 |
Refugee and immigrant consumers | .85 | .85 | .82 | .64 | .66 | .65 | .92 | 1.00 |
The correlations from complete data are based on varying numbers of items depending on how many were common to the pair of Delphi studies. These varied from 85 to 542. The correlations from imputed data are based on 109 items that had no more than 2 missing values across Delphi panels
Correlations based on complete data are in the upper diagonal and correlations based on imputed data are in the lower diagonal