Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Sci. 2016 Oct 3;353(6):516–522. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.09.013

TABLE 1.

Comparison of reference standard and trained raters’ scores.

Scoring item Reference standard Trained raters
Composite scorea % (SD) % (SD)
Good Performances 82.6% (±5.0%) 86.8% (±6.2%)*
Poor Performances 67.2% (±3.8%) 59.0% (±11.7%)
Incorrect Item Countb Average (SD) Average (SD)
Good Performances 0.50 (±0.87) 0.25 (±0.56)
Poor Performances 3.25 (±1.31) 4.55 (±2.32)

SD, Standard deviation.

*

P < 0.0001

a

Percentage of items done that should have been done.

b

Count of the number of incorrect actions performed.