Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 1;18:40. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1255-z

Table 5.

Differential expression of LEA proteins in the sahy9/apum23 mutanta compared with the wild type

Locus Protein name Biological/molecular function Fold changeb (P value) normal conditions Fold change (P value) salt stress
AT1G52690 LEA7 (LEA_4)c Embryo development ending in seed dormancy 2.83 (7.23E-07) 0.36 (2.04E-06)
AT4G21020 (LEA_4) Embryo development ending in seed dormancy 2.68 (2.61E-06) 2.22 (0.00026)
AT5G44310 (LEA_4) Embryo development ending in seed dormancy 2.64 (3.73E-06) 2.73 (3.92E-06)
AT3G17520 (LEA_4) Embryo development ending in seed dormancy 2.60 (5.1E-06) 0.54 (0.0041)
At2G42540 COR15A, (LEA_4) Response to ABA and cold 2.33 (5.66E-05) 0.60 (0.018)
AT5G53820 LEA 2.31 (7.05E-05) ns
AT4G02380 ATLEA5 (LEA_3), SAG21 Response to abscisic acid 1.98 (0.0012) ns
AT5G06760 LEA4–5 (LEA_1) Response to osmotic stress 1.90 (0.0024) 0.54 (0.0041)
AT3G02480 (LEA_4) ABR, ABA-RESPONSE PROTEIN 1.86 (0.0033) 0.61 (0.020)
AT3G15670 LEA76 (LEA_4) Embryo development ending in seed dormancy 1.79 (0.0059) 0.64 (0.035)
AT2G42560 (LEA_4) Embryo development ending in seed dormancy 1.73 (0.010) 0.33 (1.78E-07)
AT2G42530 COR15B (LEA_4) Response to ABA and cold ns 0.55 (0.0056)

aPlants were grown vertically on half-strength MS medium for 10 days and then transferred to fresh medium supplemented with or without 150 mM NaCl for 1 day. bThe fold change in sahy9/apum23 was normalized against the wild type. ns no significance. cLEA proteins were classified into groups based on previous description [24]