Table 3.
Regression of ANC factors for the selected health facilities.
| Dependent variable: utilisation (regular and irregular) dummy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Variables | Coef (β) | Std. Err. | Z | Marg. Eff. (dy/dx) | Std. Err. | z |
|
| ||||||
| Socioeconomic characteristics | ||||||
| Age | 1.42 | 0.38 | 3.71∗∗∗ | 0.04 | 0.01 | 8.22∗∗∗ |
| HH size | 2.83 | 1.01 | 2.81∗∗∗ | 0.08 | 0.02 | 3.62∗∗∗ |
| Occupational status dummy | 5.15 | 2.61 | 1.98∗∗ | 0.11 | 0.03 | 3.42∗∗∗ |
| Educational status | ||||||
| Primary | −4.31 | 2.36 | −1.83∗ | −0.10 | 0.05 | −1.97∗∗ |
| Secondary/SHS | −3.81 | 1.62 | −2.35∗∗ | −0.09 | 0.03 | −2.81∗∗∗ |
| Vocational/technical | −2.57 | 1.83 | −1.40 | −0.06 | 0.04 | −1.42 |
| Tertiary | −1.60 | 2.04 | −0.78 | −0.03 | 0.04 | −0.78 |
| Geographical distance | ||||||
| By car | −2.53 | 1.49 | −1.70∗ | −0.07 | 0.03 | −2.05∗∗ |
| Others | −1.63 | 4.72 | −0.35 | −0.04 | 0.12 | −0.37 |
| Facility | ||||||
| Asonomaso | −4.46 | 1.88 | −2.37∗∗ | −0.11 | 0.03 | −3.47∗∗∗ |
| Sakra Wonoo | −5.84 | 2.61 | −2.23∗∗ | −0.16 | 0.05 | −2.87∗∗∗ |
| Antoa | −0.60 | 2.02 | −0.30 | −0.01 | 0.04 | −0.29 |
| Miscellaneous characteristics | ||||||
| Insurance status dummy | 0.37 | 1.55 | −0.24 | −0.01 | 0.05 | −0.24 |
| Choice of facility dummy | −0.92 | 1.03 | −0.89 | −0.03 | 0.03 | −0.94 |
| Accessibility dummy | −1.49 | 1.44 | −1.03 | −0.04 | 0.04 | −1.04 |
| Satisfaction dummy | −8.51 | 2.68 | −3.17∗∗∗ | −0.27 | 0.04 | −7.51∗∗∗ |
| Attitude dummy | 2.56 | 1.78 | 1.44 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 1.89∗ |
| Quality of service dummy | 4.30 | 1.83 | 2.35∗∗ | 0.10 | 0.04 | 3.72∗∗∗ |
| Constant | −37.81 | 10.07 | −3.75 | |||
| LR chi2(19) = 159.69∗∗∗ | ||||||
| Pseudo R2 = 0.81 | ||||||
| Log likelihood = −18.83 | ||||||
NB. ∗, ∗∗, and ∗∗∗ represent significance at 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively; source: Field Survey, 2015.