Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Apr 26;116:212–217. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.04.015

Table 3.

Multivariable-adjusted regression coefficients of VAT and SAT with amylase in women and men.

Models Predictors BMI β-coeff. P-value VAT β-coeff. P-value SAT β-coeff. P-value Model’s R2
Women (N = 400)
1 BMI −0.018 ± 0.003 <0.001 0.159
2 VAT −0.189 ± 0.037 <0.001 0.158
3 SAT −0.066 ± 0.011 <0.001 0.159
4 VAT + SAT −0.126 ± 0.043 0.02 −0.045 ± 0.014 0.07 0.179
5 VAT + BMI −0.0129 ± 0.004 0.02 −0.102 ± 0.048 0.02 0.176
6 SAT + BMI −0.0134 ± 0.007 0.04 −0.023 ± 0.025 0.504 0.168
7 VAT + SAT + BMI −0.0052 ± 0.075 0.49 −0.117 ± 0.048 <0.001 −0.023 ± 0.025 0.346 0.167
Men (N = 378)
1 BMI −0.020 ± 0.005 <0.001 0.112
2 VAT −0.085 ± 0.032 0.009 0.106
3 SAT −0.053 ± 0.019 0.02 0.094
4 VAT + SAT −0.059 ± 0.037 0.102 −0.034 ± 0.022 0.251 0.112
5 VAT + BMI −0.018 ± 0.004 0.009 −0.012 ± 0.04 0.738 0.123
6 SAT + BMI −0.0271 ± 0.006 0.008 −0.033 ± 0.034 0.193 0.126
7 VAT + SAT + BMI −0.026 ± 0.009 0.006 −0.012 ± 0.04 0.75 0.043 ± 0.033 0.195 0.126

Data are presented as β-coeff.: beta coefficient ± SE; VAT: visceral adipose tissue area; SAT: subcutaneous adipose tissue area. All models were adjusted for age, ethnicity.