Table 4. Associations Among Healthy Lifestyles Initiative Implementation Strategies Engaged In, 12345 Fit-Tastic! Materials Used, and Activities Implemented in Kansas City, Missouri, and Kansas City, Kansas, 2016^a .

Variable	Materials Indexb		Implementation Activities Indexc
	B (Standard Error)	P Valued	B (Standard Error)	P Valued
Implementation strategies engaged ine
Attended ≥1 training session	10.41 (4.98)	.04	0.16 (6.12)	.98
Completed action plan	12.85 (5.11)	.01	22.70 (6.29)	.001
Received coalition support	1.21 (5.14)	.81	10.98 (6.32)	.09
Received one-on-one support	1.55 (5.29)	.77	−4.71 (6.51)	.47
Received materials or resources	4.31 (5.22)	.41	8.41 (6.42)	.19
Total implementation strategies engaged inf	5.65 (1.61)	.001	6.93 (2.06)	.001
Materials used
Materials indexb	—	—	0.45 (0.14)	.001

Abbreviation: B, unstandardized regression coefficient.

^a A brief online survey was emailed to 218 partners (defined as a person who signed up as a partner on the Healthy Lifestyles Initiative website before January 31, 2016) representing 170 organizations. More than 1 partner could represent a single organization. All data were self-reported.

^b A materials index, scaled from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating greatest overall use, was developed from 3 variables (number of types of materials used, frequency of use, and extent of use) to measure overall use of materials.

^c An implementation activities index, scaled from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating greatest level of implementation, was developed from 2 variables (number of activities implemented and extent of implementation) to indicate overall level of implementation. A list of 8 implementation activities targeted by the Healthy Lifestyles Initiative was provided.

^d Estimated by using linear regression.

^e Survey respondents identified the implementation strategies in which they had engaged from a list of 5 options.

^f The number of strategies engaged in was summed for each respondent (range, 0–5).