Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 27;75(1):58–64. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3339

Table 2. Slope of Change in Percentage Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) From Baseline in EMPOWER Placebo Group.

Variable Observations, No. Slope (95% CI), Percentage Points per Montha P Value
Overall 2337 −2.7 (−3.0 to −2.5) <.001
Age, y
<50 641 −2.3 (−2.7 to −1.8) .005b
50-65 1164 −2.6 (−2.9 to −2.3) .007c
>65 532 −3.6 (−4.3 to −2.9) NA
Sex
Male 1541 −2.6 (−2.9 to −2.3) .21d
Female 796 −3.0 (−3.3 to −2.6)
Riluzole use
No 517 −3.1 (−3.7 to −2.5) .65e
Yes 1820 −2.7 (−2.9 to −2.4)
Baseline percentage predicted SVC
<65% 93 −2.2 (−4.2 to −0.3) .25f
65%-75% 295 −2.8 (−3.6 to −2.1) .88g
>75% 1949 −2.7 (−3.0 to −2.5) NA
Site of ALS symptom onset
Bulbar 477 −3.2 (−3.8 to −2.5) .06h
Other 1860 −2.6 (−2.9 to −2.3)
Baseline ALSFRS-R total score
≤39 1095 −3.1 (−3.4 to −2.8) <.001i
>39 1242 −2.3 (−2.7 to −1.9)

Abbreviations: ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFRS-R, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale–Revised; NA, not applicable.

a

The slope was estimated using a repeated-measures mixed model and adjustment for baseline SVC.

b

P value for <50 vs >65 years.

c

P value for 50-65 vs >65 years.

d

P value for male vs female.

e

P value for no riluzole use vs riluzole use.

f

P value for <65% vs >75%.

g

P value for 65%-75% vs >75%.

h

P value for bulbar compared with other.

i

P value for ≤39 vs >39.