Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 26;9(2):128. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0141-1

Table 1.

Table providing detailed information regarding SAA patients used in this study and reprogramming efficiencies obtained for each control and patient

Patient ID Age (years) Gender Phenotype Reprogramming efficiency
WT1 Newborn Male Heathy 0.21%
WT2 51 Male Healthy 0.29%
WT3 37 Female Healthy 0.14%
SAA1 16 Male Severe AA Responded to immunosuppressors 0.11%
SAA2 24 Male Very Severe AA Responded to immunosuppressors Developed PNH and relapsed Failed with second course of horse ATG Successful matched unrelated HSCT 0.10%
SAA3 10 Female Very Severe AA and autism Successful matched unrelated HSCT 0.11%

AA aplstic anemia, PNH paroxysmal nocturnal hemaoglobinuria, ATG anti-thymocyte globulin, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation