Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 2;144(1):28–35. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1859

Table 2. Efficacy Results.

Endpoints Treatment
(N = 80)
Control
(N = 80)
Mean Difference (95% CI)
No.a Value No.a Value
By Independent Reviewer at Day 30
Primary efficacy endpoint, No. (%)
Need for postoperative interventionb 61c 7 (11.5) 61c 20 (32.8) −21.3% (−35.1% to −7.6%)
Need for surgical intervention 58c 4 (6.9) 58c 15 (25.9) −19.0% (−32.8% to −5.1%)
Need for oral steroid intervention 61c 6 (9.8) 61c 10 (16.4) −6.6% (−17.1% to 4.0%)
By Clinical Investigators at Day 30
Secondary efficacy endpoints, No. (%)
Need for postoperative interventionb 75d 12 (16.0) 75d 25 (33.3) −17.3% (−27.9% to −6.7%)
Need for surgical intervention 75d 3 (4.0) 75d 11 (14.7) −10.7% (−18.9% to −2.3%)
Need for oral steroid intervention 75d 11 (14.7) 75d 17 (22.7) −8.0% (−17.4% to 1.4%)
Inflammation (100-mm VAS), mean (SD) 79d 23.1 (24.2) 77d 35.6 (31.1) −12.3 (−18.3 to −6.4)
Occlusion/restenosis of FSO, No. (%) 75d 10 (13.3) 75d 27 (36.0) −22.7% (−33.5% to −11.9%)
Estimated FSO diameter, mean (SD), mm 79d 6.3 (2.7) 75d 4.5 (3.2) 1.9 (1.3 to 2.5)
By clinical investigators at day 90
Inflammation (100-mm VAS), mean (SD) 76d 26.0 (31.2) 77d 31.9 (32.1) −5.5 (−11.3 to 0.3)
Occlusion/restenosis of FSO, No. (%) 69d 16 (23.2) 69d 28 (40.6) −17.4% (−28.6% to −6.1%)
Estimated FSO diameter, mean (SD), mm 68d 5.7 (3.2) 68d 4.7 (3.4) 1.0 (0.2 to 1.7)
Frontal L-M CT stage, mean (SD) 78d 0.7 (0.6) 78d 0.9 (0.7) −0.2 (−0.3 to −0.1)

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; FSO, frontal sinus ostia; L-M, Lund-Mackay; VAS, visual analog scale.

a

No. of patients with evaluable sinuses.

b

Postoperative intervention was a composite end point including surgical intervention required to debride obstructive adhesions/scarring formation in the FSO (defined as grade 2 or 3 on the adhesion/scarring scale) and/or oral steroid intervention warranted to resolve recurrent inflammation or polypoid edema in the frontal recess/FSO.

c

The number of sinuses evaluable based on grading of video endoscopies by independent reviewer varied by parameter. Data were considered missing if the independent reviewer could not grade a video owing to suboptimal video quality or inadequate imaging of the relevant anatomy. Inadequate imaging of the relevant anatomy can occur when polyps in the ethmoid cavity or adhesions of the middle turbinate prevent visualization of the FSO.

d

The number of sinuses evaluable varied by parameter based on ability to visualize relevant anatomy. For example, presence of polyps in frontal recess or a middle turbinate adhesion can prevent visualization of the FSO, and therefore, estimation of ostial diameter or patency.