Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 24;9(2):87. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0124-2

Table 3.

Comparison of metabolic profile in NAFLD patients with and without IBD

Variables NAFLD + IBD (N = 78) NAFLD w/o IBD (N = 145) p-value
Weight, mean ± SD, Kg 78.1 ± 13.3 82.3 ± 15.8 0.04 1
Waist circumference, mean ± SD, cm 97.7 ± 14 102 ± 14.5 0.04 1
BMI, mean ± SD, Kg/m2 28.63 ± 4.83 30.22 ± 5.38 <0.001 1
Obesity, n (%) 21 (26.9%) 72 (52.4%) <0.001 2
Total cholesterol, mean ± SD, mg/dL 214.25 ± 42.99 218.01 ± 43.73 0.81
LDL cholesterol, mean ± SD, mg/dL 133.94 ± 37.1 130.24 ± 37.9 0.551
HDL cholesterol, mean ± SD, mg/dL 51.02 ± 14.54 49.35 ± 15.40 0.481
Triglycerides, mean ± SD, mg/dL 167.41 ± 88.64 143.3 ± 66.7 0.921
Elevated TG, n (%) 22 (29.5%) 53 (36.6%) 0.281
Fasting plasma glucose, mean ± SD, mg/dL 92.67 ± 14.82 108.2 ± 32.7 0.161
Elevated glucose, n (%) 23 (29.5%) 65 (44.8%) 0.03 2
Insulin, mean ± SD, µIU/mL 15.92 ± 11.72 12.65 ± 6.92 0.241
Hypertension, n (%) 19 (24.4%) 76 (52.4%) <0.001 2
Reduced HDL cholesterol, n (%) 20 (31.2%) 67 (48.9%) 0.02 2
Metabolic syndrome, n (%) 18 (23.1%) 82 (56.6%) <0.001 2

SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, LDL low-density level, HDL high-density level, TG triglycerides

1Student’s t-test

2Pearson’s χ2-test or two-tailed Fisher’s exact