Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;29(2):490–496. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx717

Table 1.

Demographics of patients with detectable or undetectable ctDNA

Characteristic Total Undetectable ctDNA Detectable ctDNA
N (%) N (%) N (%)
Age in years, median (range) 52 (19–87) 52 (19–79) 59 (22–87)
P value 0.29
Gender
 Male 77 (48) 70 (49) 7 (37)
 Female 84 (52) 72 (51) 12 (63)
P value 0.31
Breslow of primary tumor
 ≤2.0 mm 61 (38) 53 (37) 8 (42)
 >2–4.0 mm 49 (30) 43 (30) 6 (32)
 >4.0 mm 42 (26) 38 (27) 4 (21)
 Unknown 9 (6) 8 (6) 1 (5)
P value 0.96
Ulceration of primary tumor
 Present 63 (39) 57 (40) 6 (32)
 Absent 77 (48) 69 (49) 8 (42)
 Unknown 21 (13) 16 (11) 5 (26)
P value 0.19
Disease stage
 II 36 (22) 33 (23) 3 (16)
 IIIA 29 (18) 27 (19) 2 (11)
 IIIB 59 (37) 51 (36) 8 (42)
 IIIC 37 (23) 31 (22) 6 (32)
P value 0.61
Nodal classification
 II (No or N/A) 36 (22) 33 (23) 3 (16)
 III (N1a and N2a) 41 (26) 36 (25) 5 (26)
 III (other N) 84 (52) 73 (52) 11 (58)
P value 0.81
ECOG PS
 0 138 (86) 125 (89) 13 (68)
 1 22 (14) 16 (11) 6 (32)
P value 0.03
Mutation status
 BRAF V600E 132 (82) 117 (82) 15 (79)
 NRAS Q61K/L 29 (18) 25 (18) 4 (21)
P value 0.75
Trial arm
 Bevacizumab 81 (50) 71 (50) 10 (53)
 Observation 80 (50) 71 (50) 9 (47)
P value 0.83
Total 161 (100) 142 (88) 19 (12)

ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; N, number.

P values were obtained using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous factors and a chi-square test or Fisher's exact test with small number for categorical factors.