Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2017 Dec 22;39(11):621–636. doi: 10.1002/jcc.25139

Table 1.

Comparing binding free energies for 24 ligands obtained using YANK and FFTΔG. The FFT-based free energies were calculated using different weighting schemes, as defined in the main text. RMSE is in units of kcal/mol.

Full (24) Active (11) Inactive (13)

Weighting scheme Linear regression RMSE R RMSE R RMSE R

a y = 1.12x + 2.28 2.31(0.28) 0.90(0.06) 2.35(0.57) 0.59(0.21) 2.28(0.24) 0.96(0.02)
b y = 1.19x + 2.32 2.23(0.31) 0.90(0.06) 2.09(0.54) 0.58(0.18) 2.34(0.26) 0.96(0.02)
c y = 1.17x + 2.25 2.17(0.28) 0.91(0.05) 2.09(0.59) 0.62(0.13) 2.24(0.26) 0.96(0.02)
d y = 1.22x + 2.11 2.07(0.29) 0.90(0.06) 1.86(0.60) 0.59(0.13) 2.24(0.28) 0.96(0.03)
e y = 1.24x + 1.90 2.28(0.37) 0.87(0.07) 1.99(0.84) 0.38(0.23) 2.50(0.30) 0.94(0.03)
f y = 1.19x + 2.01 2.25(0.32) 0.88(0.07) 2.08(0.74) 0.41(0.19) 2.39(0.27) 0.94(0.03)